I realize that today, in our nation, people feel called to a moment of silence. I respect duly this movement towards remembrance, but nearly 6 years later, I have to call into question whether silence has served us, the survivors and inheritors of a wounded country, or them, the victims and human sacrifices of a war we did not ask for
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
what do you think the silence is for? it's to get those thoughts together, to concentrate on what should have been-- to separate the many different feelings. mourning for the dead in the attacks, mourning for the soldiers dead in iraq, personal loss of feelings of safety, betrayal of the trust we put in our leaders, the sheer magnitude of evil possible in the world, and the quickly-forgotten goodwill shared between americans and offered by other countries. there's a lot there, and some of it does require action (trust in leaders, lost goodwill) but some of it requires personal contemplation (feelings of insecurity, questions of evil in the world, mourning for the dead.) wound-healing comes in many forms, from personal to national.
at least that's what i do with the silence.
Reply
But we've had 6 years of that silence, 6 years to collect and to mourn and to ready, and still nothing has changed, nothing has been done. A moment of silence would be fine if it were not as every other moment sounds to me.
The dead demand more than our silence, Robin. If we take that silence as a moment of preparation, then so be it, but so far our silence has not ended, and we, as a nation, have not acted on it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/09/090706.html
and then:
http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/09/091106.html
Reply
Leave a comment