How sad, 8 1/2 years later, to wait with baited breath for the unveiling of a horrible truth that will never be noted in the history books
( Read more... )
I am not familiar with the melting points of charcoal and copper. Please tell me the hottest temperature which can be generated by a charcoal fire, and the minimum melting point of copper. If a fire is not as hot as the melting point of a metal, the metal will not melt, so I would be curious to see any documented example of this phenomenon other than the 9/11 attacks. Better yet, build a model out of steel, fill it with paper, and light it on fire. Since Building 7 did not get hit by a plane, jet fuel was not a factor, so we'll call your model Building 7. (the jet fuel really wasn't a factor in the towers' collapses either because it burned up right away, but for the sake of argument) Your model will not melt. Likewise, heat some water to 140 degrees fahrenheit and see if it boils. I guarantee it will not
( ... )
Neils Harrit can explain the science behind the collapses better than me. He is a professional... I am merely a juror. In this video is the leading scientist among a group who published an article about a year ago, regarding the findings of nano-thermite explosive materials in the dust left from the collapses. This article was published in a peer-reviewed journal, the Open Chemical Physicals Journal. Here, he talks to a Danish reporter.
People in other countries are aware of this. It's only here in the U.S. that we doubt hard facts.
My point is that you can make things burn hotter by adding air. Melting copper in 400 B.C. was done by adding a bellows to greatly increase the heat of the fire. The same is happening in the Twin towers at eh strike zones. By blowing a huge amount of air across the fire you can increase the temperature dramatically. The flame itself is not the only factor
( ... )
Comments 5
Reply
Reply
People in other countries are aware of this. It's only here in the U.S. that we doubt hard facts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment