not great

Aug 11, 2010 00:03

i started out my day with a couple of hours of meetings for my ra job and then went to the coffeeshop where i finished coding yesterday's transcript. Not much new on that front, but i was reminded in listening to my informant's description of a good and bad mother how much those things get overdetermined ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

adfamiliares August 11 2010, 12:28:21 UTC
Exclusionary definition of women?

Reply

ailiathena August 11 2010, 15:05:14 UTC
Yeah ... it's Emily Martin's The Woman In the Body, which I generally like very much. But she has this part that talks about the common experience of women in our society. She starts off okay, saying all are defined as "women," which she adds is usually a permanent category. So, okay, sure. I appreciate the reminder that being a woman is not ALWAYS a permanent category. Then she says all have a subordinate position to men in one way or another, which I'll go with at the very minimum at some structural level, right? But then she says, "all have female bodies and experience common bodily processes such as menstruation and childbirth" which ... no, actually. 1) it is now obvious that she is excluding trans women from her definition of women which I don't like, but could have been handled much better in the telling, 2) not all women who were assigned that gender at birth actually DO menstruate, etc, although most do, and 3) certainly not all women share the experience of childbirth. I understand what she's trying to say, but I think that ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up