We've seen it. In fact, we "rented" it via OnDemand from Comcast. It wasn't terrible. It was really censored (there's got to be an uncut version....somewhere), which lessened some of the ickiness. But overall, I've seen movies that were more gross. Eh.
Uwe Boll, on the other hand, probably loved it. So this comment gets the Uwe Boll thumbs-up userpic.
When I first heard the title, I thought it was something along the lines of The Fly, but with a human/centipede hybrid. Then I saw a little ... schematic ... of the title character(s) and was like, "Oh. Oh! Now I get it."
At least it sounds like the filmmaker has a sense of humor about it, too. Because, seriously: how could he not (unless he was Uwe Boll)?
I do love me some body horror. But my love may know some bounds.
The earnestness of the original question in the thread is pretty damn hilarious. I just hope they're trying to gauge the scientific feasibility of the human centipede for, you know, purely theoretic purposes ;-)
One of my friends is having a human centipede-themed party. I'm a little concerned about what that will entail -- and also mad at myself for not considering it for MaryAlice's second birthday!
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Uwe Boll, on the other hand, probably loved it. So this comment gets the Uwe Boll thumbs-up userpic.
Reply
At least it sounds like the filmmaker has a sense of humor about it, too. Because, seriously: how could he not (unless he was Uwe Boll)?
Reply
Reply
I'm not one to talk, though: I have a longstanding fixation with Troll 2.
Reply
Reply
I wonder what John Waters has to say about this one ... .
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The earnestness of the original question in the thread is pretty damn hilarious. I just hope they're trying to gauge the scientific feasibility of the human centipede for, you know, purely theoretic purposes ;-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment