(Untitled)

Feb 19, 2007 23:20

Poll You have to pick one.

Leave a comment

Comments 20

pilarcruz February 20 2007, 06:40:49 UTC
You can't make me pick. I'll turn the gun on myself.

Reply

aniccata February 20 2007, 16:29:01 UTC
For reals? See, I don't like the Beatles at all, so it's easy for me, LOLZ.

Reply

pilarcruz February 20 2007, 16:30:15 UTC
I hate them both equally.

Reply


meandmyradio February 20 2007, 07:36:21 UTC
You can tell a lot about a person based on how they answer this question. Some people get violent over it.

Reply

aniccata February 20 2007, 16:29:16 UTC
I CAN TELL WHO THE COOL PEOPLE ARE NOW.

Reply


temporise February 20 2007, 11:57:12 UTC
you know, I made a big error here. I don't know what led me to click rolling stones. i like their music better but the beatles are certainly more important, and had the good sense to break up/die.

Reply

aniccata February 20 2007, 16:30:44 UTC
I can acknowledge that the Beatles are important -- but I just don't like them at all. I never have. There are a few songs I think are okay, but I'd rather hear them redone by other people. To me, the Beatles are kind of like being Irish -- it's like a big inside joke I don't get.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

aniccata February 20 2007, 18:37:37 UTC
LOL

Reply


rebecoming February 20 2007, 12:18:09 UTC
I picked Beatles, but I need to specify that I mean their later work. I like their later work a lot, but their early stuff - no. If it was between their early stuff and the Rolling Stones, I'd pick the RS. Now you know!

Reply

aniccata February 20 2007, 16:31:38 UTC
That makes sense -- I definitely like the Beatles' newer stuff better than the older stuff, although I still prefer the Rolling Stones.

Reply


southernwebgirl February 20 2007, 15:14:05 UTC
Beatles = love.

and Mick Jagger creeps me out.

Reply

aniccata February 20 2007, 16:32:09 UTC
Keith Richards also creeps me out, but even still, the Rolling Stones are WAY better than the Beatles, LOL.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up