Necessary Evil.

Jun 02, 2003 17:55

Do not berate me for the return update's inanity, but I just had to take the test to prove how asinine it is. 106%? Mh. It's shameless to even begin to promote the rationality of there existing anything more than 100%. It really hurts to have a brain occasionally..

Though I am pleased with a few of the results. Especially Satan_dot_com's 92% and a few other ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 21

branwynelf June 2 2003, 10:05:16 UTC
Proof that I'm more trickster than war-like. I didn't bother to fill it out. Guess that makes me most compatible with all those who also didn't bother to do it - not even to be able to mock it.

Reply

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:08:01 UTC
*taps his lips with a thoroughly composed baffled look in his eyes*

I know she's making some allusion to voting, but I seem to be missing it..

Reply

well no ... branwynelf June 2 2003, 10:12:26 UTC
Was more a reference to those of the sheep mentality. Which apparently applies to deities as well as mortals, even if they do justify it by deciding they'll mock it whatever the results turn out to be.

*nods*

Reply

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:17:34 UTC
I know she's making some imputation toward bodily functions, but I seem to be missing it.. Perhaps voluntarily. *smiles*

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:10:44 UTC
But... 106%? It's not even an amusing cliched percentage. Like how 110% is almost acceptable due to its commonplace nature.. But 106? 103, even..

*broods muchly*

Reply


primalucem June 2 2003, 10:15:52 UTC
Hmm. I am 73% compatable with War. Does that make me 27% compatable with peace, or whatever it is?

And does that make Laeyla -6% compatable with peace?

You know, I can see myself being 73% compatable with war, but Laeyla seemed like such a nice girl. Her score would suggest that she's NEVER at peace.

I concur with Great Ares. This survey is stupid and innane. It must be destroyed. Maybe I can get Laeyla to do it considering how warlike and violent she apparently is.

Reply

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:25:03 UTC
As per usual, your deductions are superb.

Her flower icons provided me with more than my share of paroxysms of self-mutilating urges. The Buffy ones also equally as disturbing.

However, I cannot usually make claims toward someone's inner tranquility, or lack thereof, as much as I'd adore to corrupt those with pristine characters. Do rally to have this test blackballed, or at least ridiculed beyond repair, sweet observer.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

primalucem June 2 2003, 10:50:25 UTC
I do try. ::GRIN::

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:26:20 UTC
Absolutely not. You should be outraged and strive to ascend to my favour.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 18:18:47 UTC
I still find it amusing that people presume these tests mean anything.

Who determines what makes people attracted to each other? All the same answers? Well that's boring. Opposites attract? Well that's lovely in theory, but does not always apply.
And so forth.

Reply


cluegirl June 2 2003, 10:36:18 UTC
%103?
SOMEone needs a swift kick to the head for that bit of mathematical illogic. Though I do rather find it amusing that of all the lists on which I've seen my name appear, I rank highest on yours, Warkin.

Perhaps they award extra points for spelling and vocabulary?

Reply

ares_dot_com June 2 2003, 10:39:59 UTC
We can certainly hope..

Reply


Leave a comment

Up