Okay I know this doesn't have much to do with the fandom and all, but I figured I would start here (I know several scientific minds do dwell here
( Read more... )
It is difficult to say whether time is an actual "dimension". Some theories postulate that, others consider this a separate "property" of the local multidimensional continuum. It very well may be that we grew too attached to a "simple" pictures, portraying the time as just another coordinate. Personally I prefer to wait and see on this question. :)
Regarding the behavior of (sub)atomic particles, it hasn't yet been proven conclusively, but some suggests that the state and its evolution of the particle may depend on its energy, which in most practical cases means its speed.
And, finally, about the unification... Unification today seems as unlikely as it was for the past 30 years. I do not discount the possibility that the next day we will wake to the wonderful news, but again, in my humble opinion, it is much more likely that a new theory/model would emerge, of which both the relativity and quantum physics will be only a special, rather narrow, cases. The way classical mechanics are now viewed as an extreme case in relativistic
It's an interesting point, and I probably don't have too much to say that would be of any use; however (hee hee!) I was interested when you said that: "All atoms and sub-atomic particles move and vibrate". The reason I think (personally) that time is an actual dimension is because all atoms and sub-atomic particles DO move and vibrate. Time has to be a real, tangible dimension for this phenomenon to occur within it. The traditional three dimensions currently recognized, without time as the fourth postulated one, would be static and I believe could not have come into being without time as a discrete dimension in it's own right, moving everything else along and interacting with the other three just as much as they do with each other. The problem I've always had is with one single dimension, as I find myself unable to imagine anything with only one. But as I said, I'm no physicist, I never even went to university, so a physicist would probably be the one to ask.
Comments 3
I don't know how much of this will be new to you but you could check out lecture #9 http://academicearth.org/courses/introduction-to-astrophysics
Reply
Regarding the behavior of (sub)atomic particles, it hasn't yet been proven conclusively, but some suggests that the state and its evolution of the particle may depend on its energy, which in most practical cases means its speed.
And, finally, about the unification... Unification today seems as unlikely as it was for the past 30 years. I do not discount the possibility that the next day we will wake to the wonderful news, but again, in my humble opinion, it is much more likely that a new theory/model would emerge, of which both the relativity and quantum physics will be only a special, rather narrow, cases. The way classical mechanics are now viewed as an extreme case in relativistic
Reply
But as I said, I'm no physicist, I never even went to university, so a physicist would probably be the one to ask.
Alison
Reply
Leave a comment