Magnums are what you want; people think Dirty Harry. He'll fucking shoot the sperm dead.

May 04, 2005 22:18

There are those out there, mainly megalomaniac right-winged Christians, under the false presumption A.I.D.S is a disease only affecting the homosexual community even though it is currently more prevelant among heterosexuals such as the epidemic levels in Africa and China with experts predicting 25 million deaths in each country by 2010, but the ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

dietyofthunder May 5 2005, 05:10:40 UTC
I think you meant to put, No Magnums thats what you want. Followed by a lovely K-mart employee scampering away.

Reply

black_mage5 May 5 2005, 15:08:33 UTC
I actually thought of that instance when I wrote that subject heading. Hehe, that silly bunt.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: No, see, it's simple Christian logic. black_mage5 May 5 2005, 15:10:27 UTC
Well, you can't argue with that kind of logic; it's dictated by god or those who follow god's divine path, so it must be true.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

black_mage5 May 8 2005, 00:08:37 UTC
Frank Zappa, the only artist alive to get a parental advisory symbol on a completely instrumental album.

Reply


Statistics? helpful_ninja May 5 2005, 13:22:49 UTC
I don't get the statistical argument. I never took stats, however - I just know that exploding 10's are good.

If there are 100 people in a room, and 10 of them gay and the other 90 are hetero, a condition that affects 30% should, if everything is random and there is no reason for the condition to favor one group over another, affect 3 gays and 27 straights. 3 is 30% of 10. 27 is 30% of 90.

Right?

Reply

Re: Statistics? black_mage5 May 5 2005, 15:07:05 UTC
What I'm saying is that they seperated the gays and straights into different categories so taking the 100 ratio. There would be 10 gays and 90 straights. Now if 1 gay person has A.I.D.S. then they would count for 10% of their population, but if one straight person has A.I.D.S. then they would only count for about 1% of their population. That was the logical fallacy in argument I was trying to show.

Reply

Re: Statistics? black_mage5 May 5 2005, 15:07:35 UTC
But as long as you don't role a one hundred or a matched failure, we'll be fine.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up