It's hard to be skeptical because the Pentagon attack was hardly covered at all, and it would be very, very hard to use camera tricks on something of such magnitude. And really, if it had been something so large as a Boeing, I think there would have been a lot more media coverage and damage to the surrounding areas.
And good for you for not blowing a nut or something over this and cursing and stuff. I was hoping you wouldn't. Of course, if I was looking to really piss you off, I would say that it was UFOs that flew into the World Trade Center or something. Then again, that would piss, uh... EVERYONE off.
it got enough coverage and i see no reason to lie about it. and its easy to do camera tricks when you only show a 2 minutes of days of footage. this couldve been days later, and i thought it hit from the middle out, thats why you dont see the plane coming before the explosion. its easy to set an opinion in someones mind on something they dont know much about, after all, thats micheal moore's whole business. any intelligent person who knows more about 9/11 than he does, i.e. the news, said he was overbiased and looked like an idiot because of that movie.
im sure there are intelligent, credible people who could shoot this video down in a matter of minutes.
after briefly researching some more sites, and there are quite a few of them, that question whether or not a boeing actually hit the petagon, they seem to all ride the ideas of normal, uneducated people that a boeing can cause alot more damage than it actually can. the penagon is a very large building and the jet was going about as slow as they can. they seem to question the fact that there is no remains and how the plane only damaged the first row. the fact is, if this is a government building, and im pretty sure it is, its not made of cardboard. also, the only reason the planes that hit the world trade center took it down was that they slowed down considerably to remain inside the building and allow the fuel to burn it. this was going even slower and if the fuel burnt in the same way, it couldve burnt alot of the wreckage. they also question the size of the impact damage and this is a plane, not a bomb, they have to be made as streamlined and light as physically possible so that they dont just fall out of the sky. theyre not
( ... )
Comments 11
Reply
And good for you for not blowing a nut or something over this and cursing and stuff. I was hoping you wouldn't. Of course, if I was looking to really piss you off, I would say that it was UFOs that flew into the World Trade Center or something. Then again, that would piss, uh... EVERYONE off.
Reply
im sure there are intelligent, credible people who could shoot this video down in a matter of minutes.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
i liked the music tho lol
Reply
Reply
Reply
a well-executed argument,
but almost undeniably propoganda.
still... very interesting.
Reply
Leave a comment