Please tell me about the Jesus Penis.

Jun 16, 2003 12:54

Scraping through the red dust of sunset, I took to forward glances like innocent children first daring to chances. That being said, this weekend seems like one slow drowning. But with good moments of shopping and stupidity thrown in for measure. I had to buy the Radiohead ‘limited edition’ version of Hail to the Theif. Of course I had copy, but ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

boythunder June 16 2003, 11:20:19 UTC
you should read the book called, "a mind of its own: the cultural history of the penis". its awesome. very interesting. from caveman times to present- the penis. so if you honestly love dick, read it. but don't take MY word for it! *reading rainbow weird sound*

.carlitos.

Reply

Re: boxedrobot June 16 2003, 11:26:31 UTC
I love anyone who recomends a good book to me. Until I read it, you'll just have to settle for an unrelenting crush. I do love dick, honest. Did you just guess or did I give it away? And Reading Rainbow sounds, weird or otherwise, will always get a big grin from me.

Reply

Re: boythunder June 17 2003, 09:57:40 UTC
tee hee.

Reply


everybabyweeps June 16 2003, 13:53:52 UTC
oh. we should have had reptile coolers pre-MFA.

Reply

Re: boxedrobot June 16 2003, 16:09:22 UTC
Good idea, but then you really would need to get me a cart to drag me around in. Whee...

Reply


donutgirl June 16 2003, 15:15:18 UTC
what exactly was the picture of? If it was a naitivity scene, or a scene likely to have taken place just afterwards, the circumcision would not have happened yet. Circumcision usually occurs on the eighth day.

Which is not to say that artists always respect the likely state of historical cocks. Michaelangelo's David is intact, even though the biblical and historical David most certainly was snipped. But Michaelangelo is pervy that way.

Reply

Re: boxedrobot June 16 2003, 16:12:10 UTC
I'd thought about the time factor, but he looked so big and plump (jesus not his penis) that I took that to mean a few weeks later. It just gave me pause for thought because I'd been saying you never jesus with his full crotch exposed, and then there it was, foreskin rendered with some consideration for overhang, and the glans shining through.

Reply

asstronaut June 16 2003, 21:36:50 UTC
There are times when you often see jesus completely exposed, even as an adult. It depends on the era, and then in some eras artists were made to go back and add coy "draperies".

But I wouldn't necessarily assume he was old just because he was plump. I mean, this is God we're talking about. It reasonable to assume that he is a healthier and haler baby than average.

Reply

donutgirl June 16 2003, 21:36:57 UTC
There are times when you often see jesus completely exposed, even as an adult. It depends on the era, and then in some eras artists were made to go back and add coy "draperies".

But I wouldn't necessarily assume he was old just because he was plump. I mean, this is God we're talking about. It reasonable to assume that he is a healthier and haler baby than average.

Reply


donutgirl June 16 2003, 15:45:43 UTC
what exactly was the picture of? If it was a naitivity scene, or a scene likely to have taken place just afterwards, the circumcision would not have happened yet. Circumcision usually occurs on the eighth day.

Which is not to say that artists always respect the likely state of historical cocks. Michaelangelo's David is intact, even though the biblical and historical David most certainly was snipped. But Michaelangelo is pervy that way.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up