this is something i hate about visiting home, or being at work. i hate having to act straight, make fun of gay guys, get drawn into conversations about which girl at bay trading is the fittest. :( its too much like secondary school (where incidentaly i would have been killed if i came out
( ... )
meh who knowscee_effDecember 30 2003, 15:57:58 UTC
its strange, dont classify you are you and thats about it, wander anlong the path and classify when you can definatly do so, i dont believe in black and white, thers only grey. i knw what your both on about, if people around me know, ugn id be a dead guy
btw, on the bilological childreen bit....cee_effDecember 31 2003, 13:43:25 UTC
yeah, they think they have actually sorted that, theve got both types of gamets from two male mice, havent mannaged to make lil mice yet, but its possable
Maybe your just complicated. Like sexuality/gender/eroticism is, in general.
And congrats: Your like the first person I know who might(?) be interested in homosexual behaviour who also thinks it's just a behaviour. Most other "it's just a behaviour" type folks are pretty anti-gay, and want us to "just stop the behaviour and be as God intended... etc."
So you've shattered an illusion for me, which in one sense, is normally bad (people really like keeping their beliefs unopposed), but for me it's actually appreciated. Thanks.
Anyway, labels are a convenience, and as with all such things, they don't often work best for every situation. A lot of cases of declared homo- or hetero-sexuality (my own for instance) the label doesn't hold up under scrutiny. (I'm turned on by a lot of things, many of which don't involve the physical sex of the participants as being 'important'.) Those whom the simple labels do fit perfectly are either inexperienced, boring or repressed (in my ever-so-humble-opinion...). ;o]
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
Reply
And congrats: Your like the first person I know who might(?) be interested in homosexual behaviour who also thinks it's just a behaviour. Most other "it's just a behaviour" type folks are pretty anti-gay, and want us to "just stop the behaviour and be as God intended... etc."
So you've shattered an illusion for me, which in one sense, is normally bad (people really like keeping their beliefs unopposed), but for me it's actually appreciated. Thanks.
Anyway, labels are a convenience, and as with all such things, they don't often work best for every situation. A lot of cases of declared homo- or hetero-sexuality (my own for instance) the label doesn't hold up under scrutiny. (I'm turned on by a lot of things, many of which don't involve the physical sex of the participants as being 'important'.) Those whom the simple labels do fit perfectly are either inexperienced, boring or repressed (in my ever-so-humble-opinion...). ;o]
Reply
Leave a comment