I had previously posted that I wanted to make make very short corset (similar to a waspie even) here
http://corsetmakers.livejournal.com/2172309.htmlI had decided on a construction method with the help of the community members and I was ready to move to the pattern phase.
(
here is what I thought of after )
Comments 15
First, padding: rather than trying to incorporate padding with your corset, I would recommend a support skirt (crinoline/petticoat). It doesn't have to be as full or as flared as the 1950s style - you can just take 1-2 layers of cotton, organza, or net, gathered on a yoke (to keep the volume down at the waist) and with maybe one 4-6" deep ruffle on the hem, if you want a bit of pouf there. That will create a very smooth silhouette which supports the skirt all the way down. I know this is very much the wrong period, but Jen Thompson has an amazingly helpful comparison photo of a Natural Form dress with and without skirt support - the difference is subtle but unmistakable. Women of the 40s wore full length slips, and besides - we aren't in the 40s anymore ( ... )
Reply
- Perfectly level: Pro: the edge has support all the way around. Con: Can't be cut very long, because it'll prevent sitting down. Looks terrible on most people, imo.
- Classic front point: Pro: looks very elegant. Point cam come down in front while leaving legroom for sitting. Con: nothing is actually holding the point in, so it can bow out rather than holding the belly in.
- Front point with long hips, S-bend/Edwardian style. Pro: Something about the cut and/or the long hips really helps support the belly. I don't think it's just the shape of the bottom edge - I think it you whacked this edge on a vertical-seam Victorian/modern style, it wouldn't give the same effect. I'm still not sure exactly why this cut produces the straight front effect, but someday I'll get there. Truly Victorian ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment