A Philisophocal moment with Keyla Bade...

Apr 21, 2004 18:17


How embarassing, lol. I've written like a 3 page essay in response to a comment left on my previous journal entry. Really though, this could've been very short. But I found this guy's comment so intruiging I had to get deeper into it. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, I suggest you read the comments for the 4/20 entry. This might seem ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

iwantachrysler April 21 2004, 22:38:24 UTC
WOW! this is the entry i've enjoyed the most in ur LJ!!!

Reply


YaaaY=D dancingqt April 22 2004, 01:35:25 UTC
LoL THANKS!

Reply


exactly necromancer99 April 22 2004, 02:53:14 UTC
you have done the one thing i set out to do in accomplishing. to provoke thought. your entries prior to this one was somewhat childish and boring. if i would have not made a comment, you think you would have been able to write this long entry? maybe you could have but not much thought behind it. for this entry you thought with your mind and not actions. you write about your day and what is wrong within it. before answering that you must first think. dont let others think for you. honestly i think nietszche was an ASS. i am glad you noticed. that was my whole goal in mentioning him. anyone who writes books argumenting such other philosophers is a close minded egotist. i am myself AGNOSTIC. i dont remember which philosopher said it but i like the quote "I think therefore i am." i translate is as I CAN THINK AND THEREFORE I AM AN INDIVIDUAL.

Reply

Re: exactly iwantachrysler April 22 2004, 16:51:21 UTC

Cogito ergo sum é = “I think therefore I am”

-Rene Descartes

Reply

Re: exactly dancingqt April 24 2004, 21:08:13 UTC
So the answer is a big YES! I would have been very capable of writing an entry such as this one whether you would have chosen to push my buttons or not. Sorry to break it to you, but you didn't "teach" me anything as you mentioned in your journal. You didn't enlighten me in any sort of way. I've always thought on my own, I have no idea what would make you think otherwise. What you read in my journal is not the only thing I'm made of. A deeper thought is always in me and with the push of a button it can all come out. Now, if you knew me you'd know that I'm not one to put it all out there. I truly value my thoughts and opinions and I'm the one who decides when I wish to share them. Also, the majority of the people who comment on my journal are people I know who simply enjoy hearing about how I'm doing and what my day was like. Often you'll get a peek into my mind and what I'm thinking and feeling. Like you said, this is my livejournal. What I want to use it for is up to me. Whether it's to rant and rave about my daily struggles, share ( ... )

Reply


bkhoney April 23 2004, 18:02:22 UTC
I dont know you but I was referred by Diana to read your April 21 entry and I just want to say that I totally agree with you about christianity. People who havent experienced God's love and power obviously will never understand Christians until they experience it themselves. And I agree that Christianity isnt a religion, it's a lifestyle that we CHOOSE to live. <3 Gadys C.

Reply

nice to meet you =) dancingqt April 23 2004, 20:22:09 UTC
exaaactly

Reply


AGE OF HYPOCRISY necromancer99 April 26 2004, 16:08:35 UTC
your god is nothing. when he said LET THERE BE LIGHT, he was spoken to the angel lucifer. THE FALLEN ANGEL IS THE MORNING STAR. HE IS THE ONE THAT BRINGS LIGHT. THE LIGHT BEARER. your god is apathetic. he does not care. how can someone turn their back on their devotees and harvest love to talking monkeys (the prophecy is the greatest movie). yes i am insulting myself too. i am certainly insuting the herded sheep of the false prophet from nazarene. you wanted my full wrath. I AM THE WRAITH. I AM THE BAPHOMET. I WILL BE THE ONE THAT WILL BRING CHAOS. LAMASHTA WILL COME FOR U. PAGANTRY IN THE NAME OF ANU.

Reply

Re: AGE OF HYPOCRISY oogieboogieman April 26 2004, 19:15:19 UTC
dude, give it a rest, nobody really wants to hear ur opinion.

Reply

Re: AGE OF HYPOCRISY necromancer99 April 26 2004, 22:17:38 UTC
georgie u make me laugh.
(it's diana, i just don't wanna sign in again)

Reply

Re: AGE OF HYPOCRISY dancingqt April 26 2004, 23:37:19 UTC
K' buddy, finally you've flipped your lid. See, I knew it would come to this and I'm not about to argue with somebody like you. We began this discussion with intelligent opinions and open attitudes. You've gotten a bit off track, wouldn't you think? About the Lucifer thing, I won't even get too into that. You're a smart guy, you should know the truth about that. If it's unclear look it up. Lucifer is a FALLEN angel therefore not placed up high, he has been reduced into what he is today. Powerful he is, but my God made him and could easily break him. And about the monkey thing, if you're refering to why God would turn from His angels and love us, it's because He wanted to create beings that loved Him because they wanted to not because they were created for it. And He loves and cares about us so much that He continues to give us opportunities to turn to Him when really it would be understandable if He would've given up on us a long time ago. So, you're not as "agnostic" as you claimed to be. Because apparently you are strongly leaning ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up