for me, fear of standing out is a privilege

Jan 22, 2009 12:52

As you all know, I read LJ extremely irregularly, so it wasn't until yesterday that I came across the complex and often painful discussion about cultural appropriation that's been going on in various journals these last 10 or so days. But when I did I started to read, and then I read, and read, and read some more, and tried my hardest to listen ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 29

janne January 22 2009, 20:54:34 UTC
Come on in, the water is fine. And the storm seems to have passed for now :)

Reply


thistleingrey January 22 2009, 21:03:23 UTC
You might well have seen these in your reading, but I found jonquil's post here and vito-excalibur's here at least tangentially relevant to your post. YMMV.

Reply

thistleingrey January 23 2009, 05:00:10 UTC
See also ciderpress's post.

Reply

diony January 28 2009, 20:32:17 UTC
Thanks! All of those were interesting, and I hadn't seen any of them but jonquil's.

Reply


xiphias January 22 2009, 21:29:45 UTC
My primary care physician once told me that, in one way of looking at it, there are only two emotions, love and fear. That you can, if you so choose and find it useful to do so, look at ALL other emotions as either expressions of love or fear.

And it is a useful way to look at things. Naturally, it's limiting -- it probably oughtn't be the ONLY way one looks at emotions, but it does clarify some things, sometimes.

Reply

diony January 28 2009, 20:33:23 UTC
Hmn, interesting. I wonder if s/he connects anger to fear, then? (Which is valid, although one of the interesting things I saw in my self-defense teaching was that people almost always had either an anger gut-reaction OR a fear gut-reaction. Although what that might me neurologically I have not the faintest clue.)

Reply

xiphias January 28 2009, 21:12:26 UTC
Exactly.

His point was that our emotions do two things: want to bring us closer to something, or want to get us farther away from something (-philos and -phobos, basically). And these are both very important things -- if we don't get away from danger, we die. But if we don't find things to which we can move toward, then what is the point of life? Fear keeps you from dying, love allows you to live.

Now, there are two ways to increase distance between you and something you want to get away from: get away from it, or make it get away from you. "Fear" is a desire to move ourselves away from something; "anger", to move something away from us. Both increase distance. "Fight-or-flight" both work.

Reply

diony January 28 2009, 21:23:07 UTC
Okay, I can see that; I may need to use it in my next class. And it fits together with things I already know/believe, which is always pleasant.

I had a therapist once who said that she saw anger as a signal that we want someone (or something) to change its behaviour, and depression as a form of anger turned inward -- wanting ourselves to change our own behaviour, or feeling like our anger towards the world is so enormous that the only thing that can be done with it is to turn it against ourselves. Not necessarily 'true' but helpful through constructs for me, especially as I do see a lot of my anger towards objects because the objects don't do what they want. And thinking of it that way lets me both resolve anger towards people (because there's something I can address) and be forgiving of myself.

Reply


marith January 22 2009, 22:52:56 UTC
You are really, really brave. I haven't even dared look at most of the discussion, hiding from the ugly drama - and you read it *all* and thought about it and contributed and made a change in yourself. That impresses me a lot. :)

Reply


evilbobrex January 23 2009, 07:35:10 UTC
wait, you're white?
someday when I figure out what "white" is, I'll still avoid being it.
I think if I had ever felt a safety zone, I would have just stopped right then. but I know I haven't felt it yet.

Reply

diony January 24 2009, 22:08:45 UTC
I can't tell if you're joking or not, about my race.

But certainly growing up nobody thought I was; I had to keep explaining it & explaining it & explaining it. It was a huge shock to move out here & suddenly be obviously white.

Reply

evilbobrex January 25 2009, 02:25:49 UTC
I was being serious in that I don't identify as white, and can't imagine identifying most of those I know as white. I really don't know what it is to be white.
also, I have no intent of ever being part of the "normal" group. eh.

Reply

diony January 25 2009, 20:06:37 UTC
You might want to read this, sweetie:

http://mmcisaac.faculty.asu.edu/emc598ge/Unpacking.html

I didn't think of myself as 'white' either until I realised that not having to think about what race I am is part of being white. I did think about my race a lot growing up, though, because most people in our shared hometown assumed I wasn't white, and so I got asked about it. A lot. But then I moved to California, and out here I am so definitely, definitely white.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up