oh and...

Jan 13, 2006 00:09

BE COOL was the worst movie of the year. I'd rather see John Travolta take a dump after eating a whicker basket. Actually, I'd like to see you take a dump after eating a whicker basket.

....and it'd drop in my mouth.

Leave a comment

Comments 3

drocolate January 13 2006, 08:05:30 UTC
I did not see Be Cool, but, I did see Alexander and it was fucking terrible. I'm not saying it was any more or less terrible than Be Cool, (because as was established earlier, I haven't seen Be Cool) I'm just saying that Alexander, in my opinion, should be placed up there with Be Cool as one of the worst fucking movies of 2005 (which in my opinion was kind of a shit-ass year for movies and music in general...which makes Be Cool and Alexander that much worse). I think that is all I got. Good tidings.

Reply

doodieman January 13 2006, 13:10:44 UTC
I have not seen Alexander, but Alexander came out in 04. Alexander must be so bad that Alexander is also the worst movie of 2005. But if that were the logic than The Crow: City of Angels would probably be the worst movie of 2005, too. And that movie came out in 96. Also, I will agree and say mainstream movies were poor this year. But the smaller ones made-up for it, I think.

Movies and music will be the tits in 2006.

Reply

hutton drocolate January 13 2006, 19:13:11 UTC
I liked Alexander. I have nothing to back up my claim that it was not in fact terrible. I'm in the minority here and I know it. I will say that it got a little too "Oliver Stone-y" near the end. Then again, Oliver Stone does that in all of his movies. I think I liked it because I'm a fan of Colin Farrell and he did a good job with the material he had. I've also studied Alexander and to see it translated on the screen was pretty cool to me. Although, I could have done a better job.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up