(Untitled)

Jul 02, 2004 14:23

Cliques update: I'm a member of 22 cliques of size 11. They're all edinburgh-based, and they've all got mattariasrench and _confuzledx in them. They all also contain either jetgrrrl or dotty_84. From this information we can conclude that if only those two would add each other I would be in larger cliques and would therefore feel more speshul ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

djwally July 2 2004, 15:05:38 UTC
I looked at it myself. Apparently I'm in 6 cliques of size 15. But strangely enough, my name never comes up on anybody's clique list...

Reply

drizzleuk July 2 2004, 15:13:06 UTC
actually I think you may have been in a couple of mine. Surely you should be in at least a cuple of the people in your cliques...

Reply


fecal_facepaint July 2 2004, 16:37:39 UTC
I've never seen my name pop up anywhere. How does this thing work anyway?

Reply

drizzleuk July 2 2004, 19:37:13 UTC
It looks through everyone on your friends list and works out the largest possible group where every member of the group has every other member of the group added as a friend.

I guess you're not on any lists because your friends list goes across a fairly wide range of social groups and has all sorts of gaps - not suprising since you did a fairly big cull a few months ago and got rid of people like yrrab. By structuring your online life in this way you are rejecting the social paradigm of the net as a global village in favour of a more metro-centric social life. This indicates a high level of self-confidence and a wider interest in the world at large. I know this to be true because I read it on the back of a cereal packet.

Reply

fecal_facepaint July 3 2004, 09:59:32 UTC
Cool, what kind of cereal was it?

Reply

drizzleuk July 3 2004, 11:09:07 UTC
Shredded Wheat - they're dull but come in trustworthy packets.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up