When writing poetry, I have learned--for this day and age and for the particular style we are in--we must do away with "poet speak." That means, no romantic language, ballads to tree stumps or the like. Very depressing (and just one side, I'm sure). So I have some examples from my own writing that can help tighten up a poem and make it more
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Reply
And you're welcome to disagree. I myself love the romantic poetry. But if you write this way today, you're not going to find much audience or publishing or respect because of an entire literary history I can't go into. And no, we don't write for that reason. It's hard for me to even say more of what I mean...okay, it's like we're in the middle of a time in history. We are in post-Modernism (if you believe in it) or even after it into something as yet unnamed. Literature, as with most things, moves onward in time. To write like that harkens back to the past, which is natural. But those who move onward are those who are remembered. And maybe you don't want to be remembered either, though it more than just being ( ... )
Reply
Colloquial? I thought we weren't supposed to be colloquial. Isn't that the usual complaint? Stuff is "too colloquial"? (Am I remembering this word correctly?) *is confused*
Reply
Reply
Thanks for the tip!
Reply
You're welcome!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Oh, woe. The romance is dead. *tear*
You'll always be in my heart, Mr. Treestump.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment