(Untitled)

May 12, 2007 09:15

Check this out: Crotchless Pantaloons. For the Christian woman who wants her husband to have 'easy access'.

In fact, check out the whole site: Christian Domestic Discipline The tagline reads: Loving wife spanking in a Christian marriage.

The woman who runs the site insists there is nothing erotic about this. Sure, honey. Sure.

Leave a comment

Comments 23

radiosilents May 12 2007, 13:23:39 UTC
That's hilarious! Well, she does say this:

Eroticism:

Though we recognize by its very nature this subject can be erotic, we will keep this website as clean and wholesome as possible. However, we will not seek to deny the erotic nature of some CDD marriages as we believe it is a natural consequence of following God's plan. After all, He created eroticism to be enjoyed inside a Christian marriage.

So I don't think she's being SO coy. ;)

Reply

easilyirritable May 12 2007, 13:27:16 UTC
Oh, I missed that! Well, at least she admits it!

Reply

lotusbeans May 12 2007, 22:47:58 UTC
I read one of the stories and it was obviously meant to be erotic. Who do they think they're kidding?

Reply


anne_jumps May 12 2007, 13:56:32 UTC
I liked the comment I used as the headline in my post about it last night: "It's SM, with the acting taken out. Awful." -- bethiris

Reply


tinaguppie May 12 2007, 13:58:59 UTC
OMG, I totally want to write some pentecostal Christian porn now.

Jedediah hoisted Mable onto the double wedding ring quilt that covered their marital bed. Mable lay quietly on the bed while he lifted the skirt of her denim pinafore and encountered her white, ruffled, crotchless knickers...

Reply

easilyirritable May 16 2007, 03:07:19 UTC
Dude, that's hot. The double wedding ring quilt completes the image nicely, don't you think?

Reply


crafting_change May 12 2007, 14:23:33 UTC
in my nighmares everyone wears crotchless pantaloons.

Reply

easilyirritable May 16 2007, 03:07:42 UTC
Oh please, I know you have like seventeen pairs hanging in your closet. :)

Reply

crafting_change May 16 2007, 12:27:38 UTC
it's 18.

and it is purely for research purposes.

Reply

easilyirritable May 17 2007, 04:21:52 UTC
Research, huh? Is that what the kids are calling it these days?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: Forgive me for this. easilyirritable May 16 2007, 03:08:00 UTC
Hey, it's the only part that counts, right?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up