Complacency

Oct 21, 2008 01:20

Complacency ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

biailisha October 21 2008, 08:31:37 UTC
The economy is too big an issue that dwarfs anything else, including social issues such as this one.

Reply


easwaran October 21 2008, 08:59:50 UTC
It was quite disturbing when I learned a few weeks ago that Prop 8 was leading in the polls, because it had been behind for weeks. I'm not actually quite sure where you're located these days or how much time you have, but you might check onca_a_banana's journal for information about how to help out in other ways ( ... )

Reply

Some Evangelicals are AGAINST Prop 8 easwaran October 21 2008, 15:03:06 UTC
Some Evangelicals are starting to realize they've been duped and are recommending a no vote on Prop 8

Reply

Re: Some Evangelicals are AGAINST Prop 8 easwaran October 21 2008, 22:38:06 UTC
Whoa, this sounds like a paranoid conspiracy theory to me, together with a "Protocols of the Elders of Salt Lake" message at the end. I don't know how much we can count on infighting between evangelicals and Mormons in actuality.

Reply

leback October 22 2008, 08:59:08 UTC
It's really annoying that it's possible to amend the constitution in California by means of a bare majority on a ballot initiative. But I guess that's all we'll have to do to overturn this if it passes.

That had occurred to me too. Given how often the parental-notification-for-abortions question shows up on the ballot, I'm guessing that this particular fight also won't be over one way or another come November. That said, given the trends in public opinion elsewhere where same-sex marriage has been recognized, I suspect that if we win this time, the other side's only going to see its support diminish. But if we lose, we present the same ballot question again (and maybe throw in some language to head off the goofier objections, like "No, seriously, we're not going to force your church to perform any ceremony it doesn't want to"), and who knows?

Reply


zaitcev October 21 2008, 15:05:23 UTC
I will support the Prop 8 when gay lobby surrenders their privileges, such as "hate crime" laws, but not before. So far they ask for "fairness" while enjoying benefits of unfairness.

I don't think that the issue of gay marriage is a "risk in a close election". Firstly, it's not very important. I voted for Mitt Romney in California primaries, although he is a well known supporter of gay marriage and signed it into law when he was the governor of Massachussets. But also, all candidates drift in the same direction on this. Remember how John Kerry said: "I have the same position on gay marriage as the President... same position!" I did not study McCain's position, but considering how liberal he is, he might be a stronger proponent of it than Obama (and certainly more steadfast). Not that it matters anyway.

Reply

elisteran October 25 2008, 04:35:52 UTC
McCain supports proposition 8; obama opposes it. Neither one has been particularly vocal about it.

It's an odd moral position to support unfairness because "they" haven't "surrendered" something (which of course they can't do, not being the ones who actually implemented it).

You do realize that hate crime laws are no more "unfair" than 2nd vs 1st degree murder, or "drug possession" vs "drug possession with intent to sell", right? The intent and reasoning behind a crime have historically been subject to being examined ...

Reply


leback October 22 2008, 08:52:30 UTC
Hooray to you for taking a stand on this! My perception is that the rest of the country isn't watching California so closely that Obama is likely to have to weigh in on the issue -- those outside the state who are particularly involved in this campaign are probably mostly committed one way or another on the presidential race, regardless -- but I could be wrong.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up