I'm a little surprised that the very plausible possibility of an energy crisis isn't making it onto the front pages of the Times. Most of what I've found is buried back in the opinion and editorial pages. I think Thomas Friedman's last line in this
piece says a lot: And it says that if we don’t have a more serious energy policy, the difference
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
Of course now, the world is operating at practically no spare capacity whatsoever. Blaaargh. So even if people get with the program, the sad thing is it takes energy and resources to retool the infrastructure and if those are extremely expensive and in short supply it will never get done and...
SCREW IT I NEED MORE WINE.
Reply
One word: Reaganomics.
And people WANTED to believe. They still do. *sigh*
Reply
Instead, the truth was too scary. So Americans ran screaming in the direction of a brain-dead B-movie actor who told them what they wanted to hear, including ponies, rainbows, and cinnabuns. Because blithe self-indulgence fixes everything!
Reply
Leave a comment