Comments | evaluative: 003. [ text ]

evaluative

003. [ text ]

Jun 09, 2010 22:15

It seems that the issue of these chips will soon be a thing of the past. Perhaps those called "scientists" were not truly interested in keeping their subjects so powerless. No, it seems to be that they are much more interested in their worth, more than any sort of forced cooperation ( Read more... )

c: winry rockbell, c: meryl winterstorm, c: shinjiro aragaki, c: patchouli knowledge, c: mikado ryugamine, *ic, c: lelouch vi britannia, c: sweden, c: ichimura tetsunosuke

Comments 161

prodigal_axe June 10 2010, 02:27:42 UTC

'Thing of the past...' Don't count on it.

evaluative June 10 2010, 02:29:08 UTC

For some, then.

[ had mostly been referring to himself in the post because he's a nice and caring guy like that. ]

prodigal_axe June 10 2010, 02:31:22 UTC

Yeah, I guess... give it a couple weeks, they'll start putting that chip somewhere else instead.

evaluative June 10 2010, 02:38:07 UTC

It seems that they would consider all of this a game, in that aspect.

However, that is of no concern to me.

Thread 10

notyourpage June 10 2010, 03:56:14 UTC

Wuddya mean the worth of a person?

evaluative June 10 2010, 04:07:59 UTC

There are many things that may determine that. Perhaps the easiest way to tell is how much more useful they can be than the average human trash.

notyourpage June 10 2010, 04:14:34 UTC

That ain't right! Ya can't just judge people like that!

evaluative June 10 2010, 04:16:34 UTC

And why not?

Thread 58

rules_the_north June 10 2010, 05:39:37 UTC

cannot be determined completely. Unforseen changes are always possible.

evaluative June 10 2010, 05:45:28 UTC

It is rare that these raw materials manage to surprise me, but such changes can easily be factored into my plans.

rules_the_north June 10 2010, 06:28:48 UTC

Not about you, about the scientists.

evaluative June 10 2010, 06:42:26 UTC

Ah? My mistake-- though their unpredictability is to be expected, with how secretive they seem to be.

However, their goals seem nearly impossible to figure out, which is quite a rare occurrence.

Thread 28

eyesofgeass June 10 2010, 15:45:37 UTC

Isn't someone's worth best determined by the situation at hand?

evaluative June 10 2010, 19:05:38 UTC

Perhaps; however, I was referring more to their general worth. Though it does seem that most of these raw materials would prefer not to think about it.

eyesofgeass June 11 2010, 02:22:41 UTC

I doubt that you can blame them for that. Who would want to mull over such ideals?

evaluative June 11 2010, 02:34:00 UTC

I was simply curious-- if raw materials are able to assess others like them.

artofautomail June 10 2010, 15:48:36 UTC

What do you mean by "raw materials"?

evaluative June 10 2010, 19:06:48 UTC

Humans.

artofautomail June 10 2010, 20:21:42 UTC

And why would you call humans that?

evaluative June 10 2010, 20:35:51 UTC

Because that is the truth. They are little more than tools, or experimental guinea pigs.

Thread 12