(Untitled)

[fandom_scruples]

I won't answer previous comments because I am on dial up and I don't have the time, but for those wondering why I care so much

Comments

[tasogare_n_hime]

What do think Net-Nannys for? If your too busy trying not to spank your monkey over what we write than to take responsibility over your sibling (I have a 12 year old brother and don't have any trouble keeping him out of questonable sites at all by the way)then there are internet programs that can do your job for you.

[jangmi]

I am on dial up

hahahahahahahahahha

[blackjackrocket]

Hey, *that*, at least, happens to the best of us.

[jangmi]

karma? :o

[evilpuppy]

You do realize that adults of a consenting age to be producing such material are under no obligation, moral or otherwise, to act as babysitters for any children that do not belong to them?

Also saying "what should be a fandom of children" is a highly prejudicial and inaccurate statement. Your opinion might be that it should only be children running around fandoms, but there's no set age where it suddenly becomes inappropriate for you to stop watching/reading things that you enjoy. In that effect, you're pushing off your beliefs in an derogatory, passive-aggressive sort of way

[evilpuppy]

what should be a fandom of children

that speaks louder than anything s/h/it has said.

I believe our fandom_scruples is referring to Harry Potter and the fact that it is a children's book (at least in his/her eyes).

s/h/it is worried about the children. and I bet s/h/it believes that adults have no business being fans of children's books.

whatever.

[oulangi]

Current mood:

[ari_o]

mmmmmmmmmm nekkid 13 yo Brooke...

[anonymous]

I can understand that it isn't your responsibility to lock up your NC17 material but what I can't understand is why you wouldn't want to.

Perhaps you should refrain from posting until you can understand why this sentence makes you look like you would have a hard time finding your ass with both hands and a GPS system.