Comments | fullspeedbaby: (без темы)

fullspeedbaby

(Untitled)

Apr 02, 2006 11:00

I tend to see religions as prescriptions for spiritual memory loss. Perhaps I don't need one because I can remember just fine on my own. Doctor's don't ask you if you beleive in heart medication, they just ask if you're on it and if it's working. I think I might have finished with my religion prescription. Then again, you're only aware of what you ( Read more... )

Comments 60

mark33 April 2 2006, 10:19:27 UTC

True religion is the science of truth. You will only get so far without a teacher. Sooner or later you will need a true teacher. Beware of the fakes and frauds. There are far, far more of those.

myn_michelle April 2 2006, 13:49:02 UTC

Truth is subjective.

mark33 April 2 2006, 13:51:20 UTC

It certainly is not.

fullspeedbaby April 2 2006, 14:21:18 UTC

I don't see truth as being something absolute. truth is not a destination, it is a method, and it doesn't exist on it's own. truth is a straight path, but it's not a straight path to itself. It is relevant to the destination, but it isn't the destination. truth is an adjective posing as a noun. It is a quality of something, it isn't a thing on it's own, and therefore, must be subjective to a.) the thing it's describing, and b.) the interpreter.

Thread 52

scalarparty April 3 2006, 11:55:26 UTC

whats ur shadow philosophy???

fullspeedbaby April 3 2006, 13:57:50 UTC

heehee. I'm going to name my actual shadow. I will name it philosophy. that will be the name of my shadow, because i can't shake either of them.

myn_michelle April 3 2006, 15:39:31 UTC

What if you go in the shade?

fullspeedbaby April 3 2006, 16:00:24 UTC

well then would my shadow leave? It would depend on the definition of shadow. is my shadow the absence of light in a particular area? or is it the image that that absence creates? if it's the first, then my being in the shade doesn't affect my shadow. philosophy may still haunt me in that situation. If it is the image, then if i'm in the shade the image disapears. so then I could shake it i supose.

Thread 7

look what you've gone and done FSB:p scalarparty April 4 2006, 05:55:00 UTC

==ok so big cn't find the place where sposta comment. haha==

""dude, I think it's true(((uh oh 'true.' Themsr fighing words)), but not in the way that it's said. there will be no "getting to" be everyone and thing you've ever interacted with, you already are. It's a matter of awareness and memory""

yknow i was going to edit that after i posted it (but we can't with comments?) knew that wasn't the right word. and i agree its memory. kinda liek that ouspensky/gurjeuieffe(?)4thWay stuff: "self-Remembering" they're always talking about when one sefl-remebers and leaves the sleepwalking/waking state behind.. (that's why i like that homoevigilo (=wakingup in latin, as oppsed to "homo sapien sapien" wise/sage ha ha ( ... )