So I was trying to do this on Twitter and kept running out of space and Tweeting more to explain things, so I deleted the mess and promised to make a blog post instead. It came out of a discussion with Debi (
innerbrat) about the code talkers in World War 2
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Though, sadly, the reason the tactic was at all successful hinged on there being so few speakers of those languages, and thus on the success , not failure of the American genocide.
(When it's more than one people being driven to extinction in one sweeping event, is it appropriate to pluralise genocides?)
Reply
I actually made an edit on this point just now--failed is the wrong word, but a successful genocide implies total annihilation. "Incomplete" is the word I wish I'd used.
In any case, you're right, and I didn't mean to imply the opposite--only that there's a very vivid irony in how the histories fit together.
Reply
But I think it was a step. And a really, really cool one.
Thanks for the post! I do find 'turtle' and 'sewing machine' (and 'crazy white man' zomg) awesome.
Reply
Reply
I think!
Also I agree with Feather's comment. ^.^
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment