Birth Bias

Apr 20, 2011 11:25

Consider these statements ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 15

mellybrelly April 20 2011, 18:01:15 UTC
*like, although I think it goes so much further than medication. Some women feel empowered by going drug free for their births. I don't think birth experiences would be the same if men gave birth though.. I know I was bullied, disrespected, talked down to, treated like I was an idiot, was told I was a bad mother for my choices, sworn at, denied medications, etc.

It comes down to treating women as human beings during birth.

Reply

goldoyster April 20 2011, 18:21:09 UTC
Yes! You're totally right, med-free if someone chooses.

I just find the natural birth movement to sometimes be extreme.

What it comes down to is supportive and adequate care.

Reply

mellybrelly April 20 2011, 19:04:03 UTC
I totally understand individuals wanting to be drug free, I have a ton of friends who have had unmedicated natural births.. you know, being from hippy Vancouver Island and all ;)

I'm not always a fan of 'movements' though, since they tend to feel like they want everyone to want the same thing..

Reply

goldoyster April 20 2011, 20:15:41 UTC
I did the drug-free thing because I believed the hype that epidurals caused:

a) respiratory distress in the baby
b) slower contractions, leading to a greater likelihood of induction, leading to a greater likelihood of a c-section

Turns out those are both falsehoods and so I suffered for nothing, which really sucks.

I can totally get that labour isn't as bad for some women, or it's over so quickly that pain relief hardly enters the picture, it's just start, push and out. Lucky people those are.

Reply


beedjay April 21 2011, 00:41:52 UTC
i don't know where you got the info about the drugs not affecting the baby negatively.....i'm pretty sure that epidurals do and can cause great difficulty for the baby and is counter productive to an effective labour ( ... )

Reply

goldoyster April 21 2011, 00:55:35 UTC
I used to believe exactly what you've said here!

Actually, a book was just published that goes over a collection of recent statistics, and basically the stats show that no, epidurals don't correlate to respiratory distress, or a c-section.

Epidural Without Guilt: Childbirth Without PainI had a spinal during my c-section and I spoke to the anesthesiologist about epidurals/spinals affecting the baby. He said because the medication is delivered directly to my spinal fluid, it doesn't enter my blood supply and then does not cross the placenta and go into the baby. He said absolutely no -- it does not affect the baby. I looked into it more later and some people do say that a tiny bit could enter the blood supply, but it is very unlikely that any crosses the placenta to make it into the baby's blood supply. But then other people refute that, so I don't know. The stats show us that it is fine anyway, though. I now think that the main risk of an epidural are to the mother, not the baby ( ... )

Reply

smileybabe April 21 2011, 22:28:32 UTC
I think just like any other topic, you will find information to support either point of view depending on where you look.

Reply

goldoyster April 21 2011, 00:56:50 UTC
Still totally agree with your last paragraph, though.

By the way -- nice to hear from you. I've missed you around here.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up