Leave a comment

Comments 35

agriking December 29 2005, 13:36:00 UTC
Actually, you were a wonderful person in 2004 but thankfully you came to realize it in 2005. You're like a fine brandy that's good to start with but just keeps improving with age.

Reply

gopkidinnsb December 29 2005, 17:41:56 UTC
You're figgin' fabulous Joe...that's all there is to it

Reply

agriking December 29 2005, 17:46:36 UTC
Aww, stop it, you're going to give me an ego.

Reply


helloimfabulous December 29 2005, 13:46:44 UTC
Haha, and I have said in a previous LJ post that you remind me of a young Jake Gyllenhaal. Yum.

Happy New Year, baby doll.

XOXO!

Reply

What?! gopkidinnsb December 29 2005, 17:42:40 UTC
A young Jake?! I don't even compare! But thank ya babe :)

Happy New Year to you too...

Reply

Re: What?! kernando December 29 2005, 21:17:16 UTC
Wait, isn't Gyllenhaal still young? He's my age. And he, 5 years ago, probably wouln't compare. You don't have fanatical eyes, right?

Reply


il_viaggio_21 December 29 2005, 17:00:20 UTC
You know, I could not agree with you more about 2005.

I'm not saying 2004 was a bad year, but 2005 has been a better year than 2004 for me as well. I too made a lot of leaps and bounds with my life. There were times in which I did make some backsteps and missteps, but overall, 2005 will go down as a good year for me, and I hope for all of us.

Let us hope for an even greater 2006!

Happy New Year to you! :-)

Reply

gopkidinnsb December 29 2005, 17:44:49 UTC
Well said....that and "God Bless us everyone". Well, I don't really believe in a specified God, considering the Bible was written by 16th century monks. What's said is that people are taking the Bible to be written by God himself, when it's really a bunch of old dead white guys who claim to know what God was meaning to say. So, I'll wait until I find out what it's all about. LOL...

Anyway, I wish you a happy New Year to you as well after my religious rant haha

Reply

il_viaggio_21 December 29 2005, 18:19:01 UTC
Be careful, the Bible was not originally written by 16th century monks; translated maybe, but 16th century monks were not the original authors ( ... )

Reply

dudepower1982 December 29 2005, 22:45:52 UTC
My view on it is...even *IF* the original biblical passages remained unaltered for thousands of years - - what would have stopped the Bible's multiple authors from integrating their own puritanical biases into scripture?

We can perhaps prove the authenticity of textual documents, but no one can *prove* that what they wrote was actually the true words of the Christian God.

Reply


tallymatt December 29 2005, 17:27:22 UTC
Nicely done. It has been a good year for me as well. I'm richly blessed and I have no right to complain. =)

Reply


tallymatt December 29 2005, 17:28:25 UTC
oh and Happy New Year!

Reply

gopkidinnsb December 30 2005, 03:56:33 UTC
You too my friend!!! Complaining only solves the problems of the self, and praising solves the problem of you and those around you. So says William Jennings Bryan....

Reply

tallymatt December 31 2005, 14:04:01 UTC
Isn't that the guy that had a heart attack shortly after the scopes monkey trial?

Reply

gopkidinnsb December 31 2005, 17:27:36 UTC
Yes. He was a populist liberal, but perhaps the greatest orator and political mind of the American politcal system.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up