sparkly_archive

Jul 13, 2004 22:57

Ooh, over on sparkly_archive the discussion has turned to what kind of sexual content and kinks are common enough in stories to warrant their own search option. Have we missed any?

Leave a comment

Comments 6

nopseud July 13 2004, 14:20:40 UTC
Woof.

Reply

halimede July 13 2004, 14:39:26 UTC
Goest thou forth and comment so eloquently there, then. Though, hey, we've got shapechangers under a category currently defined as Special Effects (things that couldn't happen in the real world). :)

Reply

nopseud July 14 2004, 09:52:10 UTC
I feel a bit iffy about expressing many opinions on it, because I never really use archives so I'm probably not going to be a frequent end user. It's a nice idea for the fandom in general, though.

Reply

halimede July 14 2004, 10:03:22 UTC
Huh. Aren't all author sites technically mini-archives? This would be a really convenient way of finding everything by one author, and, theoretically, the most up to date URL for 'm too. I figure if you are a reader and/or author and you thought 'hey, where's...?' that's a valid enough reason to throw it up in the comments.

Mind you, I think someone already noticed that bestiality was listed under optionally viewable warnings, but not under kinks.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up