I do not know what you're trying to encite, but divorces would get even more expensive and I would hate to be on the receiving end of two pissed off women. :[
The one to divorce me first would get 50% of my stuff, whereas the one who divorces me second will get 50% of that, or only 25%. Therefore there will be incentive to divorce me first.
Regarding lesbianism: I know, but they don't have to be. Although as you've pointed out, that'd be like playing with fire.
Hmm... upon further review, perhaps the first to divorce me would only get 33% of my stuff, and the second would get 50% of what's left, or 33%. Maybe this isn't as big a problem as I first thought...
Sorry, I'm an idealisttheroom101December 26 2005, 06:37:10 UTC
Why do people keep assuming that marrying is a representation of sexes? It's simply an expression of two people's desire to spend their lives together. I know the origins of marriage may have different meanings, but the modern interpretation is (or should simply be) that.
The argument shouldn't be that gay marriage is okay... it should be that marriage is a sexless convention that represents love alone.
Comments 4
Oh.. and not every girl is a latent lesbian..
Reply
The one to divorce me first would get 50% of my stuff, whereas the one who divorces me second will get 50% of that, or only 25%. Therefore there will be incentive to divorce me first.
Regarding lesbianism: I know, but they don't have to be. Although as you've pointed out, that'd be like playing with fire.
Reply
Reply
The argument shouldn't be that gay marriage is okay... it should be that marriage is a sexless convention that represents love alone.
Reply
Leave a comment