Wait, what?

Mar 21, 2011 06:55

Am I the only one curious as to why the 'Retardican' bashers have suddenly gone silent when the 'Idioticrat' president of ours kicked off a new war when we've already got a handful?

It's our missiles flying, our C&C structures in place... all dressed up neatly under a veneer of a UN mandate.

Yeaahhh. Pot, meet kettle.

Leave a comment

Comments 4

jaffa_tamarin March 21 2011, 14:53:34 UTC
We're waiting for the outpourings of "support for our President in a time of crisis" from the right-wing pro-war faction.

Reply

hinoki March 21 2011, 15:13:57 UTC
Sooo... it's acceptable, then? That the Idioticrat President kicked off another war?

Interesting.. not a word anyone has said against it. Not a word on how he's committed troops and supplies to knock off a sovereign nation.

So, it evidently is acceptable if an Idioticrat pulls the trigger and blasts civilians to bits. Make no mistake.. that's why the Arab league has stayed out of it thusfar. Because they KNOW the airstrikes are going to slaughter civilians as well as their intended targets.

And the pro-war faction can kiss my ass.
I have no idea what this country is up to anymore. Honestly? It's worrying me. But it's worrying me even more that the anti-war side has gone silent when the Idioticrats start flinging missiles around like they were the Retardicans.

Reply


kymri March 21 2011, 15:21:10 UTC
To be fair, no one said anything against either of the last two wars, either. It is political suicide to speak against this sort of thing; when there's a perception put forth by the media that it's the 'right' thing to do, that's what happens.

And anyway, our parties are both psychotically right-wing (just one far more so than the other).

I wish either party would put forth a candidate to the left of President Eisenhower (a Republican). Both sides are nuts and neither has their own real political ideals any longer (they cling to their side of a wedge issue, but that's about it) and simply all go along with the media frenzy du jour.

Reply


ssurgul March 21 2011, 19:33:43 UTC
Well, given that this is based on a UN Security Council resolution to enforce a No-Fly zone, and that the President said we are NOT the frontrunners; we're primarily providing missile support only ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up