Politics

Oct 29, 2008 17:13

A libertarian friend of mine suggested that the only way to prevent our current political situation from becoming materially worse is to impose term limits on Congress. I responded to the effect that you might as well light a match in the middle of a hurricane, and that the Singularity will be upon us before a relatively pedestrian fix like term ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

anonymous October 29 2008, 23:25:33 UTC
what about fivethirtyeight.com?

Reply

howardtreesong October 30 2008, 14:14:56 UTC
Yep, even that one. He's rather more careful and refined in his narratives, but they remain narratives.

Reply

howardtreesong October 30 2008, 14:16:30 UTC
Firstly, we assign each poll a weighting based on that pollster's historical track record,

This is rather like saying "equities have returned 7% per year ever since 1930, so you can generally count on equities doing so in the future." Have you read Taleb?

Reply


adb_foldem October 30 2008, 05:28:10 UTC
Term limits are a horrible idea, basically ensuring that the legislature will be dominated by special interest groups, since none of the legislators will develop any real expertise.

Reply

howardtreesong October 30 2008, 14:07:05 UTC
I've never thought much about term limits; my neophyte's understanding of the counter to your position is that it prevents those special interest groups from really becoming entrenched through some number of very effective lawmakers, a la Ted Stevens. Without digging into it further, my inclination is slightly in favor of 'em, but I'd be interested in reading more on it. Linky?

Reply

strategery October 30 2008, 15:28:07 UTC
pb9617 October 30 2008, 16:47:55 UTC
My solution is simple. Each Rep and Sen's pay is that of the GDP/per capita of their district. Each Rep and Sen may only raise campaign funds equal to the GDP/per capita of their district.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up