(Untitled)

Jan 22, 2009 21:42

First there were two Harveys. Then, there were two Cranes. And I think there were two Rachels. And now, there are two Bruces.

I honestly can't believe this. What's this city coming to?

Leave a comment

Comments 13

rachel_dawes77 January 23 2009, 02:51:03 UTC
In before a terrible pun about duality.

Reply


harvey_twoface January 23 2009, 02:53:33 UTC
Don't forget two Two-Faces. That was a thing, briefly.

Reply

itsthecommish January 23 2009, 02:57:05 UTC
Was it? Thank god it's not anymore. You and your unfortunate temper are bad enough.

Reply


thisislexluthor January 23 2009, 02:54:30 UTC
Ironically, most of those are not my fault.

Reply

itsthecommish January 23 2009, 02:58:26 UTC
Should I be reading this as some sort of a give away that it usually is your fault?

Reply

thisislexluthor January 23 2009, 03:21:16 UTC
No. That was just an idle observation. I'm also not responsible for Gotham's occasional zombie problem.

Reply

theactionace January 23 2009, 05:21:39 UTC

feartoxin January 23 2009, 03:59:15 UTC
You're just now asking this?

Reply


mastahwhine January 23 2009, 05:21:03 UTC
My people are getting a handle on the situation, Commissioner. I believe we're not far away from finding the answer to all of this. At least, to the issue of two Rachels and two Bruces... our theory doesn't really account for the other sets.

Reply

itsthecommish January 23 2009, 06:25:50 UTC
So, there's a reasonable explanation. Wonderful. Not that it'll make me feel any better about the situation.

God, I just hope there's not another me out there.

Reply

mastahwhine January 23 2009, 12:45:08 UTC
I wouldn't exactly object to another Jim Gordon.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up