2. Why get angry about something that doesn't matter. a)It doesn't change anyone's opinion, since this decision is a reflection of the world's current opinion. b)It isn't legally binding
3. As I understand it, the wall is infringing on Palestinian territory. If the sole purpose of the wall was to stop terrorists getting into Israel, then having it not infringe on their land woudln't have been a problem, would it?
4. The wall together with the assassinations seem to be working very well. They won't stop doing what they're doing.
3. The Israeli supreme court ruled that the fences position had to be changed from the original plans to better accomodate Palestinians. And there is no such thing as Palestinian territory. The West Bank was England, then Jordan, then Israel.
I thoroughly apologize. I had something I had to deal with right then. And then on the way back, Niman called me, drunk and stumbling along Highway 7. I had to rescue him.
Comments 6
1. What did you expect?
2. Why get angry about something that doesn't matter.
a)It doesn't change anyone's opinion, since this decision is a reflection of the world's current opinion.
b)It isn't legally binding
3. As I understand it, the wall is infringing on Palestinian territory. If the sole purpose of the wall was to stop terrorists getting into Israel, then having it not infringe on their land woudln't have been a problem, would it?
4. The wall together with the assassinations seem to be working very well. They won't stop doing what they're doing.
Reply
Reply
And I think you knew what I meant anyway...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment