(Untitled)

Dec 28, 2005 00:17

I noticed that I haven't updated this in over a month so I decided to write something ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

maxandrew December 28 2005, 23:24:56 UTC
I blame Vick's futility on Jim Mora, more then Vick himself. And I am more in favor of making Vick a wide reciever, and then just putting him all over the place and doing a million different things with him. But yeah, your on the right track.

Reply

koip723 December 29 2005, 04:13:32 UTC
Well I think a lot of it has to do with Mora but I'm of the opinion that not just anyone with a strong throwing arm can lead a football team and Michael Vick does not have the something that's needed, although his brother Marcus does.

Why wide reciever? I honestly don't understand the logic there, mainly because I don't remember anyone saying that quarterback/fullback to wide out is a logical transition.

Reply

maxandrew December 30 2005, 02:48:25 UTC
Well, Matt Jones made the transition successfully. Besides, this way Vick could do reverses, reverse options, wide screens...

Reply

koip723 December 30 2005, 03:21:01 UTC
I still say that having him line up in the backfield gives you a lot more room for creativity in play calling.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up