Maybe I have been shot with it one to many times, because I find myself understanding most points of view regarding a particular issue or topic. This has the downside that rarely do I ever have my own convictions on an issue. Being strictly neutral, I piss off everyone
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
This leads me, for instance, both to support gay marriage and to be baffled by people who oppose it. Marriage is a state institution which conveys legal privileges upon people. To deny it to a class of people is to deny them equal protection under the laws. Either we must allow all citizens to marry, or we must cease treating it as a state institution.
Health care, on the other hand, I view from the perspective of utility. A healthy population is a more productive population, which advances everyone's well-being. Furthermore, it turns out that as a practical matter, in a rich society such as ours, we end up bearing the cost of everyone's health care regardless of whether we do so in a planful manner. The gravely ill indigent are not routinely turned away from our hospitals: the public reaction to the occasional ( ... )
Reply
Over the next ten years, falling attendance in medical school leads to a shortage of trained medical professionals. No longer can a given level of health care be provided to the populace, in general or in whole. Has the government just deprived the citizens of a right?
The worst part of the debate is how wrong-headed the advocated of single-payer are. The VA, as well as a lot of foreign systems, are all great examples of single-payer failing *worse* than the badly regulated market we have. Our health care market has issues (a lot of which arise from market responses to dynamics tampered with under FDR), which can be resolved, but health care as a right? Poppycock.
Don't get off your high horse, but don't necessarily stay out of line.
Reply
Reply
* Education as an infrastructure is failing, so arguing that it is a good model is not compelling to people who advocate market reforms to improve it, like the DC charter program does.
* Anecdotes for traveling American quality of emergency care, compared to citizen maintenance care abroad, is also not compelling; instead I'd recommend looking into how long it takes to schedule things like MRIs, cancer survival rate (highest in the US), survivability of early births. Are their problems with health care in this country? Absolutely. But repeating the mistakes of other systems (many of which hide their worst problems by riding on our coattails) is not the solution.
Reply
Reply
Reply
it would be nice to have quality care when i need it banked away, as opposed to paying for it and not needing it, and wasting that money basically.
#
Reply
Leave a comment