I'm a Vampire.

Aug 07, 2005 02:46


I would like to inaugurate this agglomeration of pronouncements with a series of labyrinthine words and red wine.

*Sacrafices an otter (an ugly one don't feel bad) and drinks its blood*

But getting back to the topic at hand...

We live in a world where canibalism is looked down upon and suicide is demoted. While these acts involve in the death of ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 19

rtbramstar34 August 7 2005, 13:35:59 UTC
you are so weird
yeah
beyond weird lol

Reply

manfleshbuffet August 7 2005, 15:48:44 UTC
Denial is like being on fire. Eventually you will die.
I think it's safe to say we're all going to die.
We are all in denial.
Especially you.

Reply

rtbramstar34 August 7 2005, 17:04:14 UTC
not in denial
id just rather not think about it

Reply


n_a_j_i August 7 2005, 15:29:16 UTC
Can I eat you then?

Reply

manfleshbuffet August 7 2005, 15:45:03 UTC
I am the overlord of this agglomeration. I think I've made my point.

Reply

n_a_j_i August 7 2005, 15:50:16 UTC
So you'd be the yummiest. I'm going to eat you.

Reply

manfleshbuffet August 7 2005, 16:08:50 UTC
The consumption of man flesh is a way of life. Taste is not an issue for those who commit cannibalism.

Reply


jack anonymous August 7 2005, 17:24:12 UTC
What if starving Etheopians started killing? Then we'd solve hunger too, but then all the starving people would live, thus getting rid of the whole point of killing people.

Your system has little balance.

And I think you would taste good with a lemon pepper seasoning and garlic powder, rather than A1 sauce.

psh....A1....have you no class?

Reply

Re: jack n_a_j_i August 7 2005, 17:34:53 UTC
Excuuuuse me =P Actually, lemon pepper seasoning and garlic powder sounds good. Let's eat him together.

Reply

Re: jack manfleshbuffet August 7 2005, 18:22:04 UTC
I commend your insight, but you're making illogical conclusions. Why would the starving people prosper from cannibalism? Consider this.

Thrown into the arena are two beavers. Beaver A is fat and healthy. Beaver B has not eaten in weeks. Who would logically win the fight? The need for food would give Beaver B an adrenaline rush, but Beaver A would still easily overcome him. The healthy will eat the weak and prosper from their deaths. World hunger would not be solved, it would be eliminated. Those causing world hunger become food for the strong. The populous would stabalize. Cannibalism is a well balanced benefit to mankind. To finalize my point, I would like to refer to a famous american proverb.

"You are what you eat"

I rest my case.

Reply

jack anonymous August 7 2005, 18:47:31 UTC
holy crap I just got pwned...

:'|

/doesn't know how to make a teary face

Reply


footiegrl August 7 2005, 18:31:40 UTC
rock and roll urself

Reply

manfleshbuffet August 7 2005, 18:32:42 UTC
Indeed.

Reply

footiegrl August 8 2005, 15:38:30 UTC
insanity

Reply

invrshtup August 8 2005, 15:39:06 UTC
whoops yea that was me ^

Reply


Leave a comment

Up