ongoing thoughts on Sarah Palin

Sep 03, 2008 10:54

I plan on writing about how (and why) the VP nom for Sarah Palin will set back women in national, executive politics by years. But first ( Read more... )

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 13

(The comment has been removed)

mehinda September 3 2008, 18:29:48 UTC
I'm honestly not sure that it's any more or less hypocritical. Like I said, these attitudes toward women seem pervasive on both sides of the party fence line.

Reply


4got10one September 3 2008, 18:37:39 UTC
Journalists hear a rumor and investigate it whether it is true or not, but we don't have journalists anymore, just pundits and speculators. I've never been more ashamed of my country than the last few days, hearing an entire nation pronounce judgment on this girl. Makes me sick. At this point, I just want to vote "no."

Reply

mehinda September 3 2008, 18:47:09 UTC
Right. I don't like the name-calling and gross tongue-wagging that's gone along with this announcement. At the same time, the issue does highlight crucial failings in Palin's and McCain's stance on abstinence-only sex-education.

Just because the news is salacious doesn't mean it can't also be legitimate.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

mehinda September 4 2008, 01:26:16 UTC
Honestly? I think that's a moot point insofar as Palin wants privacy extended to her daughter that she's willing (and determined) to deny to other women.

Reply


jitterbean September 3 2008, 21:24:52 UTC
I'm fairly selective in the sites I frequent, but most of the focus I've been reading has been about Sarah Palin's hypocrisy in how she is handling and wants to handle what I agree is a family issue. It hasn't been on judging Bristol at all (although this is why I only really read feminist sites).

A) The conservatives are all extolling Bristol's "choice" when they want to make their choice illegal for everyone elseB) Palin wants "privacy" for her family, when she wants the government to be involved in these matters for other women. What about MY privacy? Oh, guess that doesn't matter ( ... )

Reply

quiet_flame September 3 2008, 22:03:19 UTC
B) Palin wants "privacy" for her family, when she wants the government to be involved in these matters for other women. What about MY privacy? Oh, guess that doesn't matter.

Hear, hear.

Reply


mr_quackenbush September 4 2008, 00:26:33 UTC
the whole thing makes me sick. i feel sorry for her.

Reply

mehinda September 4 2008, 01:18:23 UTC
Bristol or Sarah?

Reply

mr_quackenbush September 4 2008, 02:05:20 UTC
Bristol. Hard enough to be a teenage mother without your mom going and making it part of the national dialog in order to further her career.

Reply

mehinda September 4 2008, 02:08:29 UTC
I agree.

Reply


considering phelbas eudaimoniacally September 4 2008, 01:07:23 UTC
ok, first of all, when studboy takes the stage tonight, the real question is whether this gives or takes his cred with the homecoming committee of Jack Frost Memorial High ( ... )

Reply

Re: considering phelbas eudaimoniacally September 4 2008, 01:21:44 UTC
To finish that dangling thought...

I'm not averse to the arrangement of lots of kids that don't get in the way of high office...it's just that it takes a singular sort of personality for the job, something extremely executive, like a DuPont, Kennedy, Addams, or Bush...then again, wait, all their kids...and she's from Alaska? Is she Mormon enough to be from Alaska AND sober ?

Or she could just be a small-time fish in an awfully big pond. The thing about being an 'insider'...is that you have some clue where to step. I mean, if everything goes perfectly for McCain, he's going to end up with a presidency that looks like a hybrid of a Carter-Bush H.W. term. That's the best case scenario.

Regardless of how one feels about Obama...his presidency would be substantially less paralyzed. And I'm pretty sure a McCain presidency would not help Japan figure out which way the wind is blowing AT ALL.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up