Conservapedia!!

[meleah]

To get around that damn liberal-bias of Wikipedia. Oh yes.

Let's kick things off with their entry on kangaroos which has already made headlines in France for its sheer stupidity

Comments

[jhumpa]

Is this for real?!?

[sly_girl]

Oh damn, they've changed it! Their definition of gravity used to say something like "A theory used by scientists and evolutionists to explain the attraction of objects towards one another."

Damned evolutionists have got their fingers in every pie!

[sly_girl]

OK, I was in the mood to look at evolution ... hahahahaha! They can't even run a damn wiki properly! Searching for evolution takes you to the page:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution

Which has the heading Theory Of Evolution (redirected from evolution) and the words (again) Theory of Evolution which are a link to:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_evolution

The main problem with the site is, of course, the fact that it is not a conservative encyclopedia. It is a Christian fundamentalist encylopedia. Big difference.

[delvene]

The JJJ guys were talking about this last week, I just hadn't go around to having a look, you know, not wanting an aneurism and all.

I can't believe that they ripped off the Wikipedia layout, though they probably want it to look as legitimate as possible.

[reynardo]

Just don't click on the link that explainas about the land bridge from Europe to Australia - it freezes and kills your browser.

[lokicarbis]

It's amusing to me that Conservapedia's own entry on 'Baraminology' is less comprehensive and less well-written than Wikipedia's :)

[meleah]

*laughs*

That's fucking great.