Comments | mmmfilletofsoul: 7th l o s t s o u l ~ [Voice]

mmmfilletofsoul

7th l o s t s o u l ~ [Voice]

May 16, 2011 21:48

[The last event left Cheyenne in a weird place and since then, she's been rather scarce around the village. Aside from getting food at one of the village restaurants, she's spent most of her time either in her apartment or in the forests just outside the village. Today, she's actually back to her usual spot: sitting on the edge of one of Luceti's ( Read more... )

monsters are people too, how does i emotion, !voice

Comments 346

(The comment has been removed)

mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 06:56:48 UTC

Simply living is enough for one to be considered a person?

(The comment has been removed)

mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 07:10:51 UTC

Unless your definition of a person includes things such as trees and flowers, I would imagine so.

Thread 28

[Written] antlioncyclone May 17 2011, 09:45:55 UTC

[deja vu I guess....or human-things just really like these kinds of questions?]

If it understands that it exists, it is a person.

[Written] mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 20:32:43 UTC

[Sorry, Mewtwo. Cheyenne isn't ignoring you, but she can't see the text written on the page. ):]

[Not Written] antlioncyclone May 17 2011, 21:53:40 UTC

[....welp]

[Voice] wantsfriedbread May 17 2011, 11:07:19 UTC

To love, or be capable of such.

[Voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 20:34:02 UTC

By that definition, a creature incapable of expressing or feeling love would not be a person, yes?

[Voice] wantsfriedbread May 18 2011, 01:00:50 UTC

That depends on how broad you'd allow that definition to be. If it is a creature of hatred, then no, it is not a person. If it is capable of affection at the very least, then yes, it is. If it is simply incapable of any emotion ... [ ... ] ... Then I am not sure. It depends on the creature and its mannerisms.

[Voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 18 2011, 02:11:31 UTC

It seems to be a rather complicated concept. I had not expected to receive such varied replies.

Thread 19

[Voice] awakenedchaos May 17 2011, 12:09:52 UTC

[That's... actually a strangely interesting question.]

Searching database for the meaning of "person"...

[There's a brief pause after she says this.]

...Search complete. The meaning of "person"... A being displaying human-like behavior or a self-conscious or rational being.

[She really is just reciting that from her database, but... well, it is the definition she's familiar with.]

[Voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 20:41:48 UTC

So there is a connection between being human and being a person?

[Voice] awakenedchaos May 17 2011, 21:42:47 UTC

[There's a pause before she answers. She has the definition of the term in her database, but not its origin. But based of what information she has, she can at least try to respond.]

Human behavior is... considered a standard for being a person. [If you go by the first definition, that is. This doesn't necessarily apply to the other one - which is why she isn't outright confirming or denying the existence of a connection.]

[Voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 18 2011, 02:38:03 UTC

I see. That is not very different from what I have been thinking.

Thread 8

[voice] neverplaysfair May 17 2011, 12:29:34 UTC

Does it matter?

[voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 20:45:32 UTC

I doesn't suppose it does, no. I was simply curious to hear what sort of answers I would receive.

[voice] neverplaysfair May 17 2011, 20:48:15 UTC

Why are you asking?

[voice] mmmfilletofsoul May 17 2011, 21:03:02 UTC

It has been on my mind since the end of the most recent experiment. [...]

Is it safe to assume you had been changed by it as well?

Thread 33