Some responses on my last post (thanks for the perspective folks!) have gotten me thinking...in our quest for authenticity in the SCA, are we throwing the baby out with the bathwater? If we strip away the older (non-period) traditions, but provide no substitution in their place, are we really doing a service to those around us? OK...the Maypole isn
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
And period young folk may have danced around a pole and sang bawdy songs -- they just didn't put ribbons on the pole and weave them together.
I'll keep cogitating...
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I also think that the SCA is more than just the study of the Middle Ages. The traditions of the group itself, and of the various kingdoms and baronies and shires, have their own value.
Reply
Reply
Not everything we do is completely authentic, but that doesnt mean it cant be fun and "medieval-ish." There are plenty of archers, fighters, and fencers out there using modern equipment to do what they do. there are Plenty of bards who sing modern folk filk. And many of us love it.
I think it is perfectly OK to have anachronistic details that are not perfectly authentic, as long as you acknowledge that it is inauthentic and have a reason for it. I do that all the time with very nice bits of calligraphy and Illumination. I use modern paint and paper because its cheaper than vellum and pigments for giving away as award scrolls. I alter some of the letters to make it easier for the herald to read.
I think working towards authenticity is a good thing, but there has to be room for SCA culture as well as medieval culture. So what if Hole in the Wall is not a perfectly medieval dance, as long as we arent trying to SAY that it is, then who cares.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment