Leave a comment

Comments 3

buhrger August 14 2009, 03:47:48 UTC
i can almost get on board with that. but then there's gödel-incompleteness.

Reply


tblumens August 14 2009, 14:08:54 UTC
Depends on how you define "scientific". I believe science can develop to the point where it'll have an explanation for everything, but current science doesn't.

Reply


Agree with Therin above andrew_the_oga August 14 2009, 18:14:34 UTC
Depends on definitions of "everything," "scientific," and "explanation." I'm not being facetious, saying that, rather, since getting agreement on these three definitions is pretty unlikely, it's pretty unlikely we can usefully answer the question.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up