Effective, yes. Great? Probably not, at least in my definition. He was a succesful mediator, and idea generator, but he failed in converting objectors into followers. He was good at getting things done, but did not reach beyond effectiveness, particularly domestically.
The primary negative thing most people I've talked to had to say about Clinton dealt with the Monica Lewinsky scandel...I'm bad with politics, so I know there must be more, but this is still the primary one I hear. If the worst thing people are going to remember about him is that he got a blowjob....
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I understand: out of sight, out of mind.
Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not is moot. Fact is he helped you.
Reply
Leave a comment