August News

[news]

We bid a very fond farewell to rahaeli last week, who started working for LiveJournal back in January 2003 when the LJ staff consisted of just a few people. We're sending out huge thanks for all of her work and contributions, and best of luck in her future as an author. You can keep track of her writing career at mccuneblog. We'll miss you, D!

Updates To Your

Comments

[anonymous]

[lightningrapier]

I think I'm in love with you.

[sexgodclari]

Yes, because it's totally clear in that picture that Harry is underage. It's so completely freaking obvious. If you can't look at that and tell he's 18 then you're just STUPID.

...no, seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you people? You HAD your warning when this happened the first time and now you're freaking out that it happens again? I would ban you fucking smacktards on principle because holy shit, what a bunch of whiny, self-indulgent dumbasses.

[lightningrapier]

...Why did this get sent to me?

[sexgodclari]

...I have absolutely no idea. It was not intentional. I think the "Post Comment" might have fucked up, as my comment didn't appear in response to the one I intended to reply to.

[lurkitty]

Nope - he doesn't look underage to me.

[ook]

You rule!

And no, Harry does NOT look under 18 in that drawing.

[silver_argento]

totally out of context, but you win for the ASOIAF icon. Much <3 to Winterfell and their wolves!

[fraser_rcmp]

You for the win.

<3

[evidux]

*dies laughing*

Oh this is priceless. One internet for you my dear.

[galerian_ash]

Not only does Harry clearly look to be of age, but it's a sweet and consensual drawing. I mean, come on!

[lovedforaday]

Is that what I think it is all over dear Harry's mouth and chest. Scandalous!

[officialbizness]

1. Snape/Harry terrifies me, and yet
2. That boy ain't underage. I will grant that because he doesn't look the same age as our dear old fart professor, it looks compromising, but a vast difference in age doesn't equal pedophilia by any stretch.

[theclamsman]

Looks at least 17 or 18 to me. Or are you LJ idiots arguing that because he's practically hairless that he's underage? Snape's hairless too. Are you punishing artists now for their inability to create significant bodyhair on these FICTIONAL characters (not that pondy had any trouble creating hair at all, it's just a question).

It's erotic art. Are you people banning erotic art now?

WHAT THE FUCK, LJ.

[sparkindarkness]

All fanficcers and slashers and smutters, we're all going to have to include beer guts, beards and LOTS of body hair to try and get through LJ censors it seems.

Until they randomly decide to delete us for another reason