I keep hearing people say, about for example the full-body scanners that The Netherlands is now employing to scan passengers on US-bound flights, that "this technology may have prevented the undie-bomber from ever boarding the plane," etc etc. Every time I hear this, I have to take a minute to go "Bzuh?" and then figure out what they really mean,
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
Reply
Seriously, though, I think the widespread usage doesn't necessarily indicate anything other than that the usage is widespread. A lot of incorrect usages are extremely widespread: the incorrect use of "begs the question" to mean "raises the question" instead of "attempts to use the premise as proof of itself" is far MORE widespread than the correct usage is, but it's still wrong. In this case, to use "may" and "might" completely interchangeably runs roughshod over the fact that there are two verbs, not one. We wouldn't need two separate forms of the verb if they didn't mean two separate things.
And, more to the point, American sources agree with me:
http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/may.html
http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/may-might-muddle/
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thank you!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment