I was just reading a draft of a paper my adviser sent to me. This is a paper that we're in the process of writing. It has four authors, but the vast majority is actually written by him and me. A week or two ago I wrote up a quick version with what I thought were the most important parts, sent that to him, then he filled in a bit more, and sent it
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
Reply
Reply
Reply
Statement 2 by Elrond
^_^
Reply
I miss you.
Reply
#2 has more wrinkles. That is to say, it isn't necessarily more complex grammatically, but it has more repetitions of certain structures: LOTS of conjunctions and other coordinating words (therefore, if, both...and, when, that, and) vs (if...then, that) and accordingly, it has many smaller predicates. #1 is mostly one predicate that is built up by phrase upon phrase.
Correspondingly, #2 feels more akin to a purely symbolic representation (approaching an equation) whereas #1 is closer to a analogical representation. For me personally, I find #1 much easier to read.
#1 also seems more vague.
Reply
Also of note: Oliver's statement is passive whereas his adviser's is active.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment