I was thinking.
I can't decide which would be more useful: being ageless, genderless, or neither.
When you think about it, being ageless has it's pros and cons. You never really know how old you are to be able to count down how many years you have until you reach a certain age, but it's good in that you never really know just how old you are.
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
As for being ageless...well, the only way for that is to not age, yeah? But that's immortality, and immortality would really suck.
Reply
Yeah, that I agree with, because then the world would become way overpopulated.
Reply
That, and Time is cruel. I wouldn't want to live forever and only end up being bored.
Reply
I guess if you've seen everything there is to see, and do everything, I could see how that'd get boring.
Reply
Society is a lot more critical of gender roles so if you're one of the few who lack either organ or have both, chances are you'll struggle finding a place to fit in. Chances are, you'll never really find anyone you can connect with and therefore forever be a reject.
Ageless is less problematic but even then people would notice, specially if you stay in the same city for a period of time. You could become a reject, or you'll forever be going out of your way to make short term relationships.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
So I say ageless. Yeah, immortality sounds kinna borin' if it's jus' you, but ya said everyone'd be immortal right? Not so bad if everybody stayin' alive forever. Jus' think of all the shit you could see or do!
Reply
But if no one dies, and people keep popping out kids, then we'd probably all be on top of each other and unable to get anywhere or do anything.
Reply
Leave a comment