third draft || [voice]

May 29, 2011 20:55

Have any of you read J. R. R. Tolkien's work? I can't recommend it highly enough--I really--oh, it's just great, you ought to read it. I read a book a night, I just couldn't put them down.

I mean, The Hobbit was a good book, no denying that, I read it when it came out, but these Lord of the Rings stories of his are above and beyond in quality. ( Read more... )

*robert alexander hastings, *daisy, *ingrid grimmholtz, *mildmay, luceti is so cool, books love kay, *kurt wagner, *leonard mccoy, *rupert giles, kay loves books, [voice], *donatello, *anne shirley, *frederic francois chopin

Leave a comment

[Voice] | I needed an excuse to tag her... semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 02:14:55 UTC
[Robert blinks at this for a moment. "The Lord of the Rings"...? ... Hadn't he seen that name in a literary database once? If he had, it was ages ago.]

I am afraid that I have never read the story, but... I may vaguely recognize the name.

... [Questioningly, because this is the part he latched onto the most:] Is there a reason you switch from "female" to "women" with your description? They are not the s-same identifier...

[Transgender rights: not a concept Kay is going to be familiar with. At all.]

Reply

[Voice] | I needed an excuse to tag her... poorneedyand May 30 2011, 02:35:20 UTC
Well, they're great. You should pick up a copy if you're out of things to read. Hell, even if you aren't.

[At his question, she frowns at the book, completely unsure of what he means by "identifier."] No reason. She's just a great character--really strong, really well-written.

((OOC: And if you don't mind sidestepping the issue of Kay's complete and utter cluelessness regarding trans people, her character isn't at a point where she'd be able to discuss the subject without her being amazingly transphobic, and I feel like that isn't really fair to make you play through. ♥))

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 02:43:17 UTC
(OOC: For the record, I don't mind Robert dealing with phobia of all kinds~ But if you'd rather not, it's fine with me. :3 I'm just... not bothered by much of anything... [and Robert's seen some admittedly-mild transphobia here already, wouldn't be the first time].)

[Well, the question seemed to be... more or less unanswered, but Robert blinks a few times. Well. It's not too unlikely for somebody to not understand the difference... as much of a shame as that is. Robert decides to let it go for now, though... He wants to pursue the topic, but this "Lord of the Rings" things seems fascinating.]

I am not entirely surprised that I do not recognize the series. Assuming multiversions with similar histories, most people here come from some point significantly in the past relative to myself.

... But I may have to look at this book then, at some point. It is a pity there is no way to read it via my nanocomputer... [Oh, how Robert longs for database access to Terra.]

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 02:50:45 UTC
...A nanocomputer? [As fascinating as Lord of the Rings is, Kay's attention has shifted pretty much completely from the subject. YOUR FUTURE TECHNOLOGY, SHE WANTS IT.] What's a nanocomputer?

((OOC: Well, if/when the time comes when the conversation would have some promising long-term effects on her, you will be the person I hit up. ♥))

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 03:00:29 UTC
(OOC: I look forward to this! \o/ )

A nanocomputer is a compact computing device, generally ranging in size from two to thirty centimetres across, though there are smaller and larger ones for specialty purposes. Most of them are based on quantum computing technology, though I have seen optical computers as well - quantum computing tends to be used for scientific fields, though, due to its faster processing of algorithms. The majority are solar powered, but the most powerful ones may run on hydrogen fuel cells, depending on the energy required.

[Robert pauses, curiously.] Are computers something common to your multiverse? Most people I speak to at least recognize them.

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 03:17:18 UTC
I wouldn't exactly call them common, but we have them. How did they ever manage to shrink them down that small? [Two to thirty centimeters across? Kay's not great with the metric system by any means, but she at least realizes that that's a hell of a lot smaller than a room.]

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 03:32:29 UTC
Well, there are a number of factors in the process, but the shift to quantum computing was probably the most important. Using electrons' spin to record data certainly reduced the necessary size of computer components.

... There are other computers that can be even smaller than the usual nanocomputer, like DNA computers, but generally they are relatively inefficient in comparison to quantum computers.

[Robert would probably be positively horrified by a picture of the ENIAC.]

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 03:41:09 UTC
[Kay, meanwhile, is fascinated by these tiny little computers of his. Most of that is technobabble to her, but it's interesting technobabble.]

You'd think people'd lose them, computers that small. I mean, if you use electrons to power them...well, there you're talking tiny.

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 03:46:41 UTC
[Robert does "interesting technobabble" very well. It's... kind of inevitable in his field.]

There are particles and other such constituents of matter far smaller than electrons - [- he says this quite easily, still not really realizing that some people haven't heard of things like quarks, leptons, or strings -] - but they would be far harder to compute with.

... I have heard some talk of the idea, though. It may be interesting to see where it goes... assuming I ever return to Terra.

[Quietly:] Not that I would entirely want to return, without the knowledge of Luceti...

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 04:09:08 UTC
...Huh.

[This is the point where it's mostly flying over Kay's head--she and Julius aren't exactly known for writing hard scifi, and there's a reason for that--but it is interesting enough. She'll have to think about tiny computers powered by bits of atoms.]

D'you like the place, too?

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 04:32:04 UTC
Not the place. I like the... individuals here.

[How does Kay do with gay rights? Because Robert has a partner. It's Donatello, so she'll probably find out eventually.]

... There is an exceedingly large amount of wonderful people here, I must admit. Even if some of their multiverses are strange... and all of them are violent.

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 14:38:14 UTC
Just about everyone I've met here has been interesting, yeah.

...Multi-verses? You mean the worlds everyone's from? They don't seem all that violent to me, from what I've heard so far.

((OOC: Kay's feelings on gay rights are...complicated. ^_-))

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 14:48:43 UTC
Ah, well... that is the unfortunate thing. My world seems an extremely rare case; it is the only one I have heard of where there are no wars.

[Robert's voice is... more than anything, almost lonely. It's such a fundamental part of his identity of a Terran, and yet it is completely foreign to everybody he has met so far, even the peaceful people he knows. Everybody he's talked to has fighting of some kind, and some people even thrive on it.]

... It seems an unfortunate constant for most of the multiversions, and hence I wonder how it came to be that my world did not do the same.

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 14:53:15 UTC
No wars? Isn't that a utopian thought.

[Sorry, kid, Kay's skeptical of the entire idea, and she sounds it.]

As long as you've got human nature, you're going to have war, even if it's only on a person-to-person level.

Reply

[Voice] semper_cogitans May 30 2011, 14:57:03 UTC
[She's right to be skeptical, in all honesty. When Robert says "Terra has no war", what he means is "Terra has nothing I recognize as war". It's only recently that he was even introduced to the concept of a war as not necessarily needing to have people using weapons or killing and dying...

... Yes, his view on war is incredibly childish. Which is why he sounds a little distressed here.]

I assure you, Terrans are quite over the whole barbaric business. There has not been a single war on Terra for over two hundred years.

[And that entire time was spent being mired in anti-violence taboos that are incredibly all-encompassing. It's pacifism to the point of bigotry.]

But I cannot blame you for having difficulty with the concept, considering the prevalence of war elsewhere.

Reply

[Voice] poorneedyand May 30 2011, 15:01:43 UTC
[Well, if that's not a way to put a bad taste in Kay's mouth, she doesn't know what is. Cue eyebrow raise.]

Barbaric, huh? I assure you, I'm acquainted with the idea of peacetime. If it's lasted that long, though, it's unlikely to hold up much longer, in my experience.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up