Review for metalfreakette

[skimmed_miilk]

Intelligence
This is tricky. At face value, metalfreakette seems kind of dumb - she even mentions failing classes. However, after reading a good chunk of entries I can see that there is something lurking under the surface. She has an interest in politics, even if her mention of them in her journal is brief. For the most part, her entries seem like a

Comments

[metalfreakette]

Awesome. I appreciate your honesty.

I'm sorry that you had to go through the pain and anxiety of reading that journal of mine... I guess the reason I kept that journal undercover is because the only people who truely understand it are those who are part of my everyday life. I got sick of my style of writing which seemed to become a cycle ("omg boys! i hate boys! GO AWAY BOYS!") so I recently trashed that journal. I found it amusing that you decided to go review the journal after I decided it sucks.

P.S.
a) Graphics were designed by myself.
b) I think I'm trying to NOT get another boyfriend.
c) Pffft. I had a 3.7 GPA when I graduated (from a blue ribbon school mind you).
d) One of my friends, whom I don't talk to much at all anymore, was reading that journal the other day, and she said that I am extremely vague in my writings. I suppose that could be a "problem". Also a "problem" would be the fact that I don't like to actually talk about what is going on in my brain.

Anyways, thank you for the review. I found it intriguing.

[skimmed_miilk]

Well, I didn't decide. You put it up for review & that's what we do.

Sorry if you didn't like it, but I am a pretty harsh reviewer.

[metalfreakette]

nah it's cool.

[schroederino]

you can't bitch if someone didn't like your journal. he's right, you DID put it up for A RATING. get over yourself.

[metalfreakette]

my reviewer was female.

i aint bitchin. now shut it.

re: allergic to capitals

[aero_____plane]

oh come now, if it's good enough for e.e.cummings... ;)

[chix0rgirl]

I think the assessment is biased. She doesn't take "the general public's opinion" or taste into consideration; it's based on her likes and dislikes. So therefore... not an admissible critique.

[skimmed_miilk]

Funny, I've been reviewing for over a year & that's never been an issue.

Any review anyone here does is always going to be biased. In fact, a lot of the guidlines even state that a section is based on "gut feeling".

You want public opinion, ask the public.

[skimmed_miilk]

Oh:

If you get a review that you don't think was fair, please respect the reviewer's opinion because it is merely that - an opinion. If you harass any reviewer in any way, or have your friends harrass them, you will be banned immediately and will not be able to be reviewed in future. If you feel it was unfair you can request a re-review. Remember that if you receive a review you don't like, you requested that review knowing full well it might contain negative points. If you aren't prepared to receive a negative review, then don't sign up. Remember that due to the length of waiting for a review, the review may not be reflective of your journal at the time when you sign up, but of the journal at the time it is reviewed.

I thank you.