First, a mental note. KROGSTAD? Jesus, Roch, and I thought I had a bad name.
That bein' said. She's apathetic and unambitious in the extreme. So Slytherin's out. Unless it's about TV, she doesn't seem to care that much about knnowing things either, so Ravenclaw's out. So it's a tussle between Hufflepuff and Gryffindor.
If there's anything the girl needed to make it to where she is now, even as much as she doesn't give a damn, is having more guts than a hundred normal men, or fifty normal women. Besides. The word 'loyal' and 'cat' aren't hand and hand, girl, and just has never been as fun as anything else. So Roch, as generic and lame as it is, you get Gryffindor.
Let's Sort Harry Larkinsegev_stormlordSeptember 2 2004, 15:59:32 UTC
Let's see. Not particularly outgoing, but willing to open up to smaller groups of friends. (S)He is a shapeshifter, but seemed to have too much reluctance to read books for books' sake to be a Ravenclaw.
Slytherin...Didn't seem particularly ambitious from what I'd seen. Not really nervy enough to be Gryffindor, and does seem to have some willingness to work and a steadiness of character (despite the unsteadyness of hir physical form), so I'll put the shapeshifter in:
Re: Let's Sort Harry LarkinardwedenSeptember 11 2004, 08:55:56 UTC
Gotta disagree there. I think Harry's a Ravenclaw. He's not tremendously brave or chivalrous, he's not ambitious (that we've seen) though he does have a slight ends-justify-the-means streak. He's a fairly hard worker when it comes to one thing, and that is...
Learning.
Harry wants to learn. He knows much more than he should for some kid off the street, including a few languages. Now that he's offered the chance to learn more, he's almost always seen struggling through one of those books Hank inflicted on them or asking questions. Harry's got the street smarts, true, but he knows much more than he needed to survive and make sure his current goals are met.
And he wants to learn about people. He wants to learn about everything. He has knowledge lust if I've ever seen it.
So, that's what I think. Ravenclaw for Harry.
(Just had to disagree there. I'll sort Sally for you, Segev. ;P)
Re: Rochelle :kagamiSeptember 2 2004, 18:41:08 UTC
Nah. Roch may not be ambitious, but she's certainly cunning and believes the ends justify the means. She might be daring, but she's deffinately not brave. She has no nerves to speak of, and she's anything but chivalrous. So totally Slytherin, yo.
Let's see. Well, Nasira's certainly not afraid of hard work. And she's certainly loyal to Shan, but then again, that's because Shan's her employer, I guess. The stick against her being Hufflepuff in my mind is probably the "just" bit. She's a little too generally apathetic, not to mention ready to kill. @_@ So not Hufflepuff.
As for Ravenclaw...ahahahaha. Nasira's smart to an extent, but it's not a book-smart sort of thing. Not Ravenclaw either.
Now, she's definitely the sort who feels the ends justify the means, I would say, and she is rather cunning in a sense, but her ambition seems rather vague. Still, Slytherin is still a possibility.
However...now we come to Gryffindor, and when it comes to Gryff qualities, Nasira's amount of daring, nerve, and bravery (maybe not necessarily chivalry ^^) tromps her cunning and "ends justify means" philosophy all over the place. So my final decision is...Gryffindor.
Like everybody else in Battle High, Ao-Lang is a great big can of whoopass. She shows a little loyalty, but it's far from a defining trait, so no Flufflepuff for her.
She's quite happy working outside the rules, and values knowledge mainly as a means to an end, so that rules out Ravenclaw, leaving the pretty birdies or the sneaky snakes.
Let's see. Gee. She's a gambler, a sneak, and will do pretty much anything to get ahead, including dragging her slacker team along behind her. Sounds like Slytherin to me.
A-W in the HOOD!rp_babbleSeptember 3 2004, 13:52:18 UTC
Sorter: Zegon | Sort: Alex Wilke | Game: X-Pialadocious
Let's see... First, I feel we can all rule out Slytherin. Alex is not nearly ambitious enough to be considered for the house, and even if he was he lacks the 'ends justifies the means' attitude.
We can also take away Ravenclaw, as he doesn't have any lust for knowledge and he hasn't displayed any real amounts of cleverness either.
So that boils it down to Griffindor and Hufflepuff. In a recent mini, he did confront his powers, although with a great amount of insistance by Eric and Sally. On the other side, he's tried his best to stay loyal to the community as a whole by NOT using his abilities. It is my opinion, however, that Alex is far too lacking in nerves: he's been more recessive than aggressive when confronted with a situation. Likewise, as he was being shaped up to be a model, he's probably not afraid of hard work. So, I sort Alex Wilke into HUFFLEPUFF!
Let's Sort Rei!yu_meiSeptember 7 2004, 16:48:29 UTC
Rei is fairly straightforward. She's got brain-lust, but that isn't really her defining trait. Admittedly, weirdness IS her defining trait, but that doesn't qualify her for any house, so instead I go on her boldness. Rei is, in fact, bold. She doesn't give a crap what anyone thinks of her, and she's unafraid of doing what she thinks is right, and even if she can't do much in the right direction, and the odds are heavily against her, she'll still Fight! for what's Right!. And stuff. This is what I choose for her defining trait house-wise. Sure, she's maybe hard-working and loyal enough to be in Hufflepuff, but it's not as big a part of her, I think. As for Slytherin, she doesn't take after her godmother nearly enough to qualify there. So! Gryffindor for Rei!
Comments 22
First, a mental note. KROGSTAD? Jesus, Roch, and I thought I had a bad name.
That bein' said. She's apathetic and unambitious in the extreme. So Slytherin's out. Unless it's about TV, she doesn't seem to care that much about knnowing things either, so Ravenclaw's out. So it's a tussle between Hufflepuff and Gryffindor.
If there's anything the girl needed to make it to where she is now, even as much as she doesn't give a damn, is having more guts than a hundred normal men, or fifty normal women. Besides. The word 'loyal' and 'cat' aren't hand and hand, girl, and just has never been as fun as anything else. So Roch, as generic and lame as it is, you get Gryffindor.
Reply
Not particularly outgoing, but willing to open up to smaller groups of friends. (S)He is a shapeshifter, but seemed to have too much reluctance to read books for books' sake to be a Ravenclaw.
Slytherin...Didn't seem particularly ambitious from what I'd seen. Not really nervy enough to be Gryffindor, and does seem to have some willingness to work and a steadiness of character (despite the unsteadyness of hir physical form), so I'll put the shapeshifter in:
HUFFLEPUFF.
Reply
Learning.
Harry wants to learn. He knows much more than he should for some kid off the street, including a few languages. Now that he's offered the chance to learn more, he's almost always seen struggling through one of those books Hank inflicted on them or asking questions. Harry's got the street smarts, true, but he knows much more than he needed to survive and make sure his current goals are met.
And he wants to learn about people. He wants to learn about everything. He has knowledge lust if I've ever seen it.
So, that's what I think. Ravenclaw for Harry.
(Just had to disagree there. I'll sort Sally for you, Segev. ;P)
Reply
Reply
As for Ravenclaw...ahahahaha. Nasira's smart to an extent, but it's not a book-smart sort of thing. Not Ravenclaw either.
Now, she's definitely the sort who feels the ends justify the means, I would say, and she is rather cunning in a sense, but her ambition seems rather vague. Still, Slytherin is still a possibility.
However...now we come to Gryffindor, and when it comes to Gryff qualities, Nasira's amount of daring, nerve, and bravery (maybe not necessarily chivalry ^^) tromps her cunning and "ends justify means" philosophy all over the place. So my final decision is...Gryffindor.
Reply
Reply
She's quite happy working outside the rules, and values knowledge mainly as a means to an end, so that rules out Ravenclaw, leaving the pretty birdies or the sneaky snakes.
Let's see. Gee. She's a gambler, a sneak, and will do pretty much anything to get ahead, including dragging her slacker team along behind her. Sounds like Slytherin to me.
And this is so not because I hate Gryffindor. :P
Reply
Let's see... First, I feel we can all rule out Slytherin. Alex is not nearly ambitious enough to be considered for the house, and even if he was he lacks the 'ends justifies the means' attitude.
We can also take away Ravenclaw, as he doesn't have any lust for knowledge and he hasn't displayed any real amounts of cleverness either.
So that boils it down to Griffindor and Hufflepuff. In a recent mini, he did confront his powers, although with a great amount of insistance by Eric and Sally. On the other side, he's tried his best to stay loyal to the community as a whole by NOT using his abilities. It is my opinion, however, that Alex is far too lacking in nerves: he's been more recessive than aggressive when confronted with a situation. Likewise, as he was being shaped up to be a model, he's probably not afraid of hard work. So, I sort Alex Wilke into HUFFLEPUFF!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Gryffindor for Rei!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment