Comments | scienceandgod: For <strong class="lj-user"><a href="/read/user/savagestime">savagestime</a></strong>

scienceandgod

For savagestime

Feb 21, 2009 03:17

Despite the topic, I promise it's nothing bad. It's more the implication of it

( Read more... )

Comments 7

(The comment has been removed)

scienceandgod February 21 2009, 23:21:01 UTC

...somehow, I find it hilarious that Arthur's two choices of love are either gay or incestuous. And that is good for me as a writer, I think, but just a little worrying in other aspects.

See? Good things happen that are sending me to hell when you go to bed on time.

(The comment has been removed)

scienceandgod February 21 2009, 23:32:43 UTC

Or alternatively, Noah! One single family to repopulate the entire world.

We have inbred so many times according to the bible.

Thread 6

laser_not_sonic February 22 2009, 08:23:31 UTC

Hah, yes! That is sweet and adorable and wonderful. I've been inspired before, actually, to write Arthur/Winnie, and now you're just increasing that urge, damn you.

scienceandgod February 23 2009, 02:12:33 UTC

I feel the people who tempt me are entirely to blame. I'm glad you liked it, though! If I can make incest between historical figures adorable, then somehow I feel like I've done something right.

brigadiertardis February 23 2009, 16:59:55 UTC

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

--that is all.

scienceandgod February 24 2009, 03:04:31 UTC

Evil. That is what you are. Evil in a TARDIS shirt.