(Untitled)

Nov 30, 2009 17:03

The pathology came back and "luckily" it turns out that it was not a molar pregnancy. I say luckily because that whole molar thing sounded pretty messed up and scary. The downside is that this means that I was pregnant with triplets, and lost all of them. That's kind of mind boggling, to say the least.

Debbie Downer, in the house.

Leave a comment

Comments 3

rumblebrumble December 1 2009, 01:45:17 UTC
suck.

I am a bit relieved to hear this though, because i read up on the molar stuff, and youre right, it did sound scary and messed up. Does this mean you dont have to abide by the 1-year waiting period? that would be good.

boy - no wonder you were feeling the pregnancy symptoms so strongly - triplets!

i'm still thinking about you, and i hope you're doing alright. *hugs*

Reply


aircrash December 1 2009, 04:35:18 UTC
/snugs

Reply


twerpalicious December 1 2009, 09:24:18 UTC
I realize it's devastating either way and don't mean to undermine that. But I'm glad it's devastating at least with a future for you instead of devastating devastating devastating, you know?

Maybe "grateful" is a better word there than "glad."

Reply


Leave a comment

Up